Dismissed¶24

Smt. Satrupa Tiwari v. Mayank Pande @ Manu @ Mahraj

Chhattisgarh HC20 Jan 2026ACQA/74/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

ACQA No. 74 of 2021, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decision dated 21/01/2026, coram Rajani Dubey and Radhakishan Agrawal; appellants Satrupa Tiwari and Premlata Choube; respondents Mayank Pande @ Manu @ Mahraj, Himanshu Sharma @ Rampi Sharma, Sarvan @ Shravan Kevat, Harichandra Kevat, State of Chhattisgarh; appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of appellants' counsel on 14.01.2026 and again when called twice on 21.01.2026; no statutes or precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Since no one appeared for the appellants on 14.01.2026 and again when the matter was called twice on the hearing date, the Court had no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. ¶23

Smt. Satrupa Tiwari Vs Mayank Pande @ Manu @ Mahraj — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

2026:CGHC:3496-DB

¶3

Digitally signed by PRIYANKA PRIYANKA VERMA VERMA Date: 2026.01.21 16:18:11 +0530

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

NAFR

¶6

ACQA No. 74 of 2021

¶7

1 - Smt. Satrupa Tiwari W/o Shri Bhrigunandan Prasad Tiwari Aged About 62 Years D/o Late Shri Baliram Pandey R/o Village And Post Malhar O.P. Malhar Police Station Masturi Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

2 - Smt. Premlata Choube W/o Late Shri Sharad Choube Aged About 57 Years D/o Late Shri Baliram Pandey R/o Rudra Vihar, Ashok Nagar Bilaspur, Police Station Sarkanda District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

... Appellant

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - Mayank Pande @ Manu @ Mahraj S/o Shri Ashok Pande Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Padariya Police Station Takhatpur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

2 - Himanshu Sharma @ Rampi Sharma S/o Shri Ramjeevan Sharma Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Kanvalpur Post Chheenbhog Police Station, Tahsil And District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶13

3 - Sarvan @ Shravan Kevat S/o Ramprasad Kevat Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Khajuri Navagaon (Kathakoni) Police Station Chakarbhata District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶14

4 - Harichandra Kevat S/o Rajaram Keva Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Avas Mohalla Padariya, Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶15

5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Bilaspur (Police Station Incharge Takhatpur) District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

¶18

For Appellants : None For Respondent No.1 : Ms. Sandhya Baghel, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Mirza Hafeez Baig, Advocate For Respondents No.2 to 4 : Mr. R.N. Pusty and Mr. Pallav Mishra, Advocates For State/Respondent No.5 : Mr. Avinash Singh, GA

¶19

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey and Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

¶20

Order on Board 21/01/2026

¶21

Per Rajani Dubey, J.

¶22

1. No one appeared on behalf of the appellants on 14.01.2026 and even today, when the matter was called twice, none appears on their behalf.

¶23

2. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this Appeal for want of prosecution.

¶24

3. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶25

Sd/- Sd/( Rajani Dubey ) ( Radhakishan Agrawal ) Judge Judge

¶26

Priyanka

Smt. Satrupa Tiwari v. Mayank Pande @ Manu @ Mahraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Satrupa Tiwari v. Mayank Pande @ Manu @ Mahraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siyaram Sen Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

X Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhumisuta Pradhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Parmeshwar Dhurwey

Abc Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Makhan Kaushik Vs State of Chhattisgarh