Ashok and Another v. State Of Chhattisgarh and another
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court (Bilaspur) single-judge order, 06/04/2026, dismissing ACQA No. 234 of 2015 for want of prosecution after repeated non-appearance and non-representation by the appellants (Ashok s/o Biharilal and Bitawan w/o Biharilal, Village Saradih, Mahasamund); Respondent 1 is the State of Chhattisgarh through SHO, PS Mahasamund (represented by Narayan Prasad, Panel Lawyer); Respondent 2 is Ramsewak s/o Kapil Satnami; purely procedural dismissal — no issue of law, statute or precedent adjudicated; document marked NAFR.
What did the court decide?
In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, no other option was left to the Court but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. ¶17