Dismissed¶25

Shri Krishna Nagar Residents Association v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC9 Feb 2026/599/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Maintainability of writ petition; dismissal on ground of efficacious alternative remedy of appeal under Section 44, Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, against Tehsildar's order under Section 250 CGLRC. Keywords: alternative remedy, Section 250 CGLRC, Section 44 CGLRC, Tehsildar Tilda, maintainability, writ petition dismissed, Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, WPC No. 599 of 2026, Rakesh Mohan Pandey, neutral citation 2026:CGHC:7313.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is not maintainable because the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy of appeal against the order passed by the Tehsildar; accordingly the petition is dismissed. ¶25

Shri Krishna Nagar Residents Association Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

2026:CGHC:7313

NAFR

NIRMALA RAO

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPC No. 599 of 2026

¶7

1 - Shri Krishna Nagar Residents Association Through Its President, Shri Rajesh Kumar Sharma S/o Late Radheshyam Sharma Aged About 59 Years, R/o Krishna Colony, Ward No. 18, Tilda, P.S. Nevra, Tehsil- Tilda, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

... Petitioner(s)

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

2 - The Collector Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

3 - The SDO (Revenue) Tilda-Newra, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶13

4 - The Tehsildar Tilda Tehsil- Tilda, Newra, District- Raipur.

¶14

5 - Director Town And Country Planning, Raipur, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶15

6 - M/s. Shri Krishna Colonizer Through Its Partner, Shri Sunil Kumar Gupta, S/o Kedarnath Gupta, R/o Mohaba Bazar, Raipur, Village Tilda, P.H.N. 19, Tehsil- Tilda, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶16

... Respondent(s)

¶17

For Petitioner : Shri Shailesh Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 4 : Shri Shobhit Mishra, Advocate.

¶18

¶19

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey

¶20

Order on Board

¶21

10.02.2026

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order passed by the Tehsildar under Section 250 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code (CGLRC) is without jurisdiction and is bad in law.

¶23

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would submit that the order passed by the Tehsildar in a proceeding under Section 250 of the CGLRC is appealable according to the provisions of Section 44 of the Code.

¶24

Heard.

¶25

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy to prefer an appeal against the order passed by the Tehsildar, therefore, in my opinion, this petition is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed.

¶26

Certified copy of the order be returned back to counsel for the petitioner after retaining its xerox copy on record.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)

¶29

Judge

¶30

Nimmi

Shri Krishna Nagar Residents Association v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Krishna Nagar Residents Association v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Archana Mishra (in Person) Vs Andhra Bank

Awadhesh Narayan Mishra (in Person) Vs Andhra Bank

Rupesh Kumar Verma Vs C.G. State Information Commission

Kalam Ansari Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dashru Gond (Since Dead) Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Hembati Shori Vs Girwar Soni