Dismissed¶32

M/S Swastik Wires v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC7 Sept 2025WPT/31/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Default dismissal; want of prosecution; non-appearance of counsel; M/s Swastik Wires v. State of Chhattisgarh; Chhattisgarh commercial tax writ petitions; W.P(T) 179/2014; W.P(T) 21/2016; W.P(T) 31/2018; Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J.; order dated 08.09.2025; no relief granted; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

As none appeared for the petitioners on 30.09.2024, 11.11.2024, 03.01.2025 or on the date of the order despite repeated calls and no representation was made, the Court held it had no option but to dismiss all three petitions for want of prosecution. ¶32

M/S Swastik Wires Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:45634

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

W.P(T) No.179 of 2014

¶6

M/s Swastik Wires (A Regd. Partnership Firm) R.C.No.TIN22791300075 10-Panch-Sheel-Nagar Raipur Pin 492001 Tah. And Dist. Raipur (CG) Through Authorized Signatory L.C. Sonwane Age 58 Yrs S/o Lt. B. Sonwane Sr. Manager (Taxation) M/s Swastik Wires --- Petitioner

¶7

versus

¶8

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary Commercial Tax Department Secretariat Mahandi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Raipur-492001 Tah & Distt-Raipur (CG)

¶9

2 – Shri S.L. Agrawal Additional Commissioner Commercial Tax Raipur-492001, Tah & Distt-Raipur (CG)

¶10

3 - R.K.Trivedi Additional Commercial Tax Chhattisgarh Raipur492001, Tah & Distt-Raipur (CG)

¶11

SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA

¶12

Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2025.09.09 10:33:17 +0530

¶13

4 - Hon’ble Neelima Tigga Deputy Commissioner Commercial Tax (Head Quarter) Raipur-492001, Tah & Distt-Raipur (CG)

¶14

--- Respondents

¶15

¶16

W.P(T) No. 21 of 2016

¶17

M/s Swastik Wires (A Registered Partnership Firm) R. C. No. (TIN 22791300075) 10 Panch Sheel Nagar Raipur, PIN 492001 Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh Through Authorized Signatory L. C. Sonwane Aged About 58 Years, S/o Late B. Sonwane Sr. Manager (Taxation) M/s Swastik Wires. --- Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary Commercial Tax Department Secretariat Mahandi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Raipur-492001 Tah & Distt-Raipur (CG)

¶20

2 - Shri S.L. Agrawal Additional Commissioner Commercial Tax Raipur-492001, Tah & Distt-Raipur (CG)

¶21

3 - Shri Sunil Choudhary, Assistant Commissioner Of Sales Tax, Sale Tax Office, Civil Lines, Raipur Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents

¶22

W.P(T) No. 31 of 2018

¶23

1 - M/s Swastik Wires ( A Registered Partnership Firm ) R.C. No. (TIN - 22791300075) 10, Panchsheel Nagar Raipur, PIN - 492001 Through L. C. Sonwane Aged About 60 Years S/o Late Shri B. Sonwane, Sr. Manager (Taxation) M/s Swastik Wires, 10, Panch Sheel Nagar Raipur- 492001. R/o 42/27 Mother Teressa Nagar, Police Station Chhawani , Bhilai - 490001 Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner

¶24

¶25

Versus

¶26

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary Commercial Tax Department Secretariat Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Raipur - 492001 Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶27

2 - Additional Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department Chhattisgarh Raipur - 492001, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents

¶28

For Petitioners : None. For Respondent/State : Ms. Anuradha Jain, PL.

¶29

Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board

¶30

08.09.2025

¶31

None appeared for the Petitioners on 30.09.2024, 11.11.2024 and on 03.01.2025. Even today, despite repeated calls, none appeared for the Petitioners nor any representation is made.

¶32

In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss all these Petitions for want of prosecution.

¶33

Accordingly, all the three Petitions are dismissed for want of

¶34

prosecution.

¶35

Sd/-

¶36

(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) JUDGE

¶37

Priya

M/S Swastik Wires v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Swastik Wires v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Agrawal Vs Shekh Mujeeb Alam

Chirag Combines Vs Shri Ranjeet Chhatri

Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Vs Shyamlal Jaiswal and Another

Khokshi @ Somnath Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/s Swastik Wires Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Pushpanjali Dewangan Vs Ved Prakash Dewangan