Disposed¶23

Bhanupratap Singh Jaisindhu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC19 Mar 2025WPS/981/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPS No. 981 of 2021; decided 20.03.2025 by Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas; Article 226 challenge to inaction in considering candidature for promotional post of Head Constable (Radio); petition disposed of as infructuous by efflux of time; liberty reserved to file afresh petition; no costs, no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to file afresh petition if exigency so arise. ¶23

Bhanupratap Singh Jaisindhu Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2025)

2025:CGHC:13230

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 981 of 2021

¶6

Bhanupratap Singh Jaisindhu S/o Shri Ramkumar Singh Jaisindhu Aged About 30 Years R/o Soridnagar, Kali Mandir Colony, Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

¶7

Hem Kumar Korram S/o Late Shri Santuram Korram Aged About 29 Years R/o Qtr. No. S-04, Polytechnic College Parisar, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶8

Lokesh Kumar Netam S/o Shri Bhuneshwar Prasad Netam Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Gadaghat, Post Tumakala, P. S. Dhamdha, District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶9

... Petitioner(s)

¶10

versus

¶11

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home (Police), Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Village Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶12

Assistant Inspector General Of Police (Radio) Office At Sector-19, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶13

Special Director General (Sdg) Of Police (Radio) Chhattisgarh Office At Sector 19, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶14

... Respondent(s)

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate For Respondent State : Mr. Sanjeev Pandey, Dy. Advocate General

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board

¶17

20.03.2025

¶18

The petitioners have filed the present writ petition under Article 226

¶19

Digitally signed by MANISH MANISH YADAV YADAV Date: 2025.03.21 10:54:12 +0530

¶20

¶21

of the Constitution of India challenging the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities by which the respondent authorities did not consider the candidature of the petitioners for the promotional post i.e. Head Constable (Radio).

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the instant petition become infructuous by efflux of time.

¶23

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous, however, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file afresh petition if exigency so arise.

¶24

Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge

¶25

Manish

Bhanupratap Singh Jaisindhu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhanupratap Singh Jaisindhu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Prasad Jaltare Vs Raj Singh Vishwakarma

Suban Lal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ravi Rathore Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sanat Kumar Tiwari Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shashi Kumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Trilochan Singh Chawla Vs M/S Tuteja Medical Agency