Paklu Ram Kachchh Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Paklu Ram Kachchh Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

1

2025:CGHC:34044

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WPS No. 7961 of 2025

1 - Paklu Ram Kachchh S/o Kanwal Singh Kachchh Aged About 38 Years Resident Of H. No. 205, School Para, Golawand, Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh.

... Petitioner

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary of Department of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2 - Collector Kondagaon Collectorate, Dist - Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh.

3 - Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development Kondagaon Dist - Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh.

4 - Directorate Of Public Education Chhattisgarh 1st Floor Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5 - District Education Officer Dist - Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh.

6 - Primary School Golawand Block Kondagaon, Dist - Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh.

7 - Primary School Khadpadi Block - Kondagaon, Dist - Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondents

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

For Petitioner : Mr. Raza Ali, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. S.P. Kale, Addl. Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Order on Board

18-07-2025

By way of this writ petition, the petitioner(s) is/are challenging the impugned transfer order(s) and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner(s)

Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN

2

has/have been declared surplus Teacher(s) and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions.

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) would submit that the petitioner has not joined at his transferred place of posting. It is further submitted that the list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner(s) and if the petitioner(s) is/are not granted relief, he/she/they will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner still wants to pursue his representation before the concerned authorities to redress his grievances.

Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioner(s) has/have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that if the petitioner(s) is/are having any grievance, he/she/they may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on his/her/their representation(s) in accordance with law within a stipulated period.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents.

In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner(s) is/are directed to make fresh representation(s) before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today and thereafter the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of five days from the date of receipt of representation(s) in accordance with law in objective manner.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge

Aadil