Sheo Prasad (P.No. 5288) Vs Steel Authority of India Limited

¶1

1

¶2

Digitally signed YOGESH by YOGESHTIWARI TIWARI Date: 2025.11.03 14:14:19 +0530

¶3

2025:CGHC:53534-DB

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 6863 of 2019

¶7

Sheo Prasad (P.No. 5288) S/o Shri Raj Deo Ram Aged About 66 Years Designation Assistant General Manager, (E6) Department Blast Furnace (Tape Hole Mass Shop), Bhilai Steel Plant, Steel Authority Of India Limited, Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - Steel Authority Of India Limited (A Government Company Registered As Per Provisions of Section 617 Of The Companies Act 1956) Through Managing Director Bhilai Steel Plant, Ispat Bhawan, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

¶11

2 - Shri Ram Harinand P. No. 5649, Deputy General Manager (E7), Department Blast Furnace (B.F. No. 8), Bhilai Steel Plant, Steel Authority Of India Limited, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Petitioner : None
For Respondents : Mr. Suyash Gupta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Kashif Shakeel, Advocate

¶14

Hon'ble Smt. Rajani Dubey, Judge

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board

¶16

Per Rajani Dubey, J. 03.11.2025

¶17

1 None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition when the case is called out even in two rounds.

¶18

2

¶19

2 Mr. Suyash Gupta, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Kashif Shakeel, learned counsel for respondents is present.

¶20

3 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-

¶21

“(I) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for entire records of T.A. No. 08 of 2013 relating to Sheo Prasad V/s Steel Authority of India Limited and Another.

¶22

(II) That if the Hon'ble Court be pleased to order dated quash the impugned 11/01/2019 in T.A. No. 8 of 2013Annexure P-2 by issueing writ of certiorari or any other writ deemed fit in the interest of justice.

¶23

(III) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant reliefs claims by him in para 7 of T.A. No. 08/2013 by appropriate writ and order.

¶24

(IV) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue any other writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions deemed fit in the interest of justice.”

¶25

4 Today, when the case is called, the petitioner is not present, nor is there any representation on his behalf to press this petition despite repeated calls. It further appears from the record that the SPC issued to the petitioner on 02.09.2025, but the same has been returned unserved with the endorsement ‘present address not known’.

¶26

5 In view of the aforesaid circumstances, we are left with no option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.

¶27

6 Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶28

Sd/Sd/(Rajani Dubey) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad ) Judge Judge

¶29

Yogesh

Sheo Prasad (P.No. 5288) v. Steel Authority of India Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheo Prasad (P.No. 5288) v. Steel Authority of India Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Billu Srivas @ Sunil @ Kallu Srivas Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Bisahu Ram Hidko Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ajay Kumar Barik Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sanat Gupta Vs Rajesh Bicholia(Dead) through Legal Heirs

Assistant Commissioner Income Tax Officer 1 (1) Vs Jayshree Paddy Processor Pvt. Ltd.

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Kamala Chandrakar