Rakesh Bhawal v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Kramonnati Vetanman claim (1st and 2nd) by Assistant Teacher and Head Master, Govt. Primary Schools, Block/Distt. Surajpur, Chhattisgarh; disposal with liberty to file representation; four-month outer limit for consideration; direction to consider State circular(s) and Division Bench judgment in Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh, WA No. 261 of 2023; no merits adjudicated; respondents include Secretaries of School Education and Panchayat & Rural Development Departments, Director DPI, DEO/BEO Surajpur, CEO Zila Panchayat and CEO Janpad Panchayat Surajpur; advocates: Pramod Ramteke (petitioners), Vinay Pandey, Dy. AG (State).
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit a representation (with supporting documents and the WA No. 261 of 2023 judgment) to the respondents/competent authority, which is to consider it in accordance with law, in light of the relevant circular(s) and the WA No. 261 of 2023 judgment, within four months of receipt; no opinion expressed on merits.