Dismissed¶40

Lata Kurmi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC15 Dec 2025WPS/4222/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for want of prosecution; counsel pleaded no instruction; petitioners Lata Kurmi, Lalit Kumar Suryawanshi and Chandrashekhar Rathore v. State of Chhattisgarh (School Education Department), Collector Janjgir-Champa, DEO Sakti and Director, Steering Management Committee, Government Higher Secondary Excellent School S. No. 1; advocates: Ms. Apoorva Ghore / Mr. Prasoon Agrawal (petitioners), Mr. Ritesh Giri (State), Mr. Yash Karan Singh / Mr. Amrito Das (Res. 4); liberty to revive granted; marked NAFR; no statute or precedent cited; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to revive the case, if any grievance remains. ¶40

Lata Kurmi Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:61141

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 4222 of 2020

¶6

Lata Kurmi D/o Sitaram Gavel Aged About 33 Years R/o Jata, Kosmanda, Jata, JanjgirChampa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶7

--- Petitioner.

¶8

Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2025.12.16 16:57:31 +0530

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

2 - Collector, Janjgir-Champa District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

¶12

3 - District Education Officer, Sakti District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶13

4 - Director, Steering Management Committee Government Higher Secondary Excellent School S. No. 1, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶14

--- Respondent(s)

¶15

With

¶16

WPS No. 4228 of 2020

¶17

Lalit Kumar Suryawanshi S/o Ratanlal Aged About 29 Years R/o Station Road, Ward No. 2, Deori, Janjgir- Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶18

--- Petitioner

¶19

Versus

¶20

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶21

2 - Collector, Janjgir- Champa District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

¶22

3 - Distric Education Officer, Sakti District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶23

¶24

4 - Director, Steering Management Committee Government Higher Secondary Excellent School S. No. 1, Janjgir District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s)

¶25

With

¶26

WPS No. 4276 of 2020

¶27

Chandrashekhar Rathore S/o Jai Chand Rathore Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Saragaon, Tehsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner.

¶28

Versus

¶29

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶30

2 - Collector Janjgir Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh

¶31

3 - District Education Officer Sakti, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶32

4 - Director Steering Management Committee, Government Higher Secondary Excellent School S.No. 1, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s)

¶33

--- Respondent(s)

¶34

(Cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery)

¶35

For Petitioner(s)	:	Ms. Apoorva Ghore, Adv on behalf of Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate.
For Res No.1 to 3/State	:	Mr. Ritesh Giri, Panel Lawyer.
For Res No.4	:	Mr. Yash Karan Singh, Adv on behalf of Mr. Amrito Das.

¶36

SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

¶37

Order on Board

¶38

16.12.2025

¶39

Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instruction in the case to argue the matter further.

¶40

Considering the said submission, these petitions are dismissed for want prosecution.

¶41

However, the petitioners would be liberty to revive the case, if any grievance remains.

¶42

Sd/-

¶43

(Deepak Kumar Tiwari)

¶44

Judge

¶45

Ajay

Lata Kurmi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lata Kurmi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.S. Kutty Krishnan Nair Vs State of Chhattisgarh

D K Jodh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Haidar Aalam Vs Vijay Kumar Dansena

Mercy Thomos Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Prakash Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Amir Khan Vs State of Chhattisgarh