Dismissed¶¶24

A.P.Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Feb 2025WPS/3273/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPS No. 3273 of 2017; dismissal for non-prosecution; petitioners absent/unrepresented ('None though served'); case called twice (second round of hearing); no merits decided; no relief; parties include retired/serving Assistant Grade-II PWD employees, State of Chhattisgarh PWD, Union of India (DoPT), Executive Engineer Brijesh Kumar Patoria, State of Madhya Pradesh; Judge: Sanjay S. Agrawal (Single Bench); order dated 18/02/2025; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

Since no one appeared for the petitioners nor was any representation made even when the case was called in the second round of hearing, the Court was left with no option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. ¶¶23

A.P.Rathore Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

2025:CGHC:8414

¶3

Digitally signed by VAISHALI VAISHALI LUCKY LUCKY NAGARIA NAGARIA Date: 2025.02.18 17:46:19 +0530

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

WPS No. 3273 of 2017

¶7

A.P.Rathore S/o Late B.R. Rathore Aged About 66 Years Assistatn Grade- Ii- Retired, Public Works Department, R/o - 79, Yadunandan Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

Suresh Kumar Gupta, S/o Late M.L. Gupta, Aged About 54 Years Assistatn Grade- Ii- , Public Works Department, Division No 01, , Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

... Petitioners

¶10

versus

¶11

State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works, Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipru, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

Engineer- In- Chief, E- In- C P.W. D Sirpur, Bhavan Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

Union of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Personnel, P G And Pensions Department of Personnel And Training, North Block, Bew Delhi- 110001, Delhi.

¶14

Shri Brijesh Kumar Patoria, S/o Late K.L. Patoria, Aged About 51 Years Posted As Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, National Highway Division, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja, Chhattisgarh.

¶15

State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Public Works Department, Madhya Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

For Petitioners : None though served. For State/Respondents: Ms. Pragya Pandey, Dy. G.A No. 1 and 2 For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Pandey, Central Government Counsel.

¶18

¶19

Single Bench: Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal

¶20

Order on Board

¶21

18/02/2025

¶22

No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioners even when the case is called in the second round of hearing.

¶23

In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this petition for nonprosecution.

¶24

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

(Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE

¶27

vaishali

A.P.Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.P.Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashish Kumar Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Kumar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Anita Bai Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Membai Dadsena Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ishwar Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Surjeet Singh Khanuja Vs Bahadur Singh