Ram Baran Chaurasia Vs State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1

¶2

2025:CGHC:27388

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 2618 of 2023

¶6

1 - Ram Baran Chaurasia S/o Shri T.R. Chaurasia Aged About 58 Years Occupation In-Charge Sub Engineer, Water Resource Division Kondagaon District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh

¶7

... Petitioner(s)

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Water Resource Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶10

2 - Engineer In Chief Mahanadi Project Water Resource Department, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶11

3 - Chief Engineer Mahanadi Project Water Resource Department, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶12

... Respondent(s)

¶13

(Cause title taken from Case Information System)

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj, Advocate
For Respondent(s)/State	: Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

¶16

Order on Board

¶17

24/06/2025

¶18

1 . The Petitioner has filed the present writ petition claiming the following

¶19

VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.06.25 19:06:38 +0530

¶20

reliefs:-

¶21

2

¶22

“10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner for its kind perusal.

¶23

10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to setaside the impugned order dated 01.03.2023 (Annexure P-1) and revoke the suspension of petitioner.

¶24

10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as if may deem fit and appropriate.

¶25

10.4 Cost of the petition may also be given.”

¶26

2 . Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was working as Sub-Divisional Officer, Water Resources Division, Kondagaon and was placed under suspension vide order dated 30.06.2022 (Annexure P/2) against which he has filed an appeal before the State Government, which has also been dismissed vide order dated 01.03.2023 (Annexure P/1) and the same is under challenge in the present petition.

¶27

3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that during pendency of the present petition, the respondents No. 2 and 3 recommended for revocation of suspension of the petitioner and sent their recommendation to the State Government on 22.04.2024 (Annexure P/9) and 13.06.2024 (Annexure P/10), but the same is under consideration before the State Government, and till date, the suspension of the petitioner has not been revoked. Therefore, he confined his submission to the extent that, the respondent No.1/State may be directed to take a

¶28

3

¶29

decision on the recommendation made by the respondents No. 2 and 3 (Annexure P/9 and P/10) within a stipulated period.

¶30

4 . Learned counsel for the State, though objected on merits, but he has no objection, if such a direction is to be given to the respondent No. 1 to take a decision on the recommendation made by the respondents No. 2 and 3. He would further submit that the respondent No. 1 will take a decision on the recommendation, if it is not already decided.

¶31

5 . On due consideration and the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and also under his limited prayer, the respondent No. 1 is directed to take a decision on the recommendation made by the respondents No. 2 and 3, dated 22.04.2024 and 13.06.2024 within 60 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, in accordance with law, on its own merits.

¶32

6 . The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week to the respondent No. 1.

¶33

7 . With the aforesaid observation, the present petition is disposed of .

¶34

Sd/(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge

¶35

ved

Ram Baran Chaurasia v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Baran Chaurasia v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manmohan Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Alpa Sankhyak Machhua Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Kosgai Para Baloda Vs Janmejai Mahobe

Smt. Shikha Kumar Vs Shri Vivek Tiwari

Yes Bank Limited Vs the Tashilar

Chamru Ram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Prakash Kumar Chandel Vs State of Chhattisgarh