Prasun Kumar Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPS No. 1990 of 2023; decided 10.10.2025; neutral citation 2025:CGHC:50746; single judge Amitendra Kishore Prasad. Petitioners: Prasun Kumar Sharma, Devendra Gidroniya, Rajeev Verma (Water Resources Department officers); Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (Department of Water Resource), Engineer-in-Chief, and seven departmental engineers (Deepak Kumar Bumerkar, Kuldeep Tirki, Indrajeet Uikey, Jayant Pawar, Kuber Singh Guruwar, Bipin Kishore Khalkho, Jageshwar Ram Bhagat). Counsel: Malay Shrivastava for petitioners; Abhishek Singh, PL for Respondents/State. Two-paragraph order: petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission of efflux of time; no merits adjudication, no statute or precedent engaged. Of value only as a record of disposal by infructuity, not citable for any proposition of law.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous, on the basis of learned counsel's submission that by efflux of time the petition had become infructuous.