Dismissed¶37

Dulesh Mrig Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC9 Jan 2025WPS/191/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WPS No. 191 of 2025, Dulesh Mrig Sahu and 9 others (ADPPOs) versus State of Chhattisgarh, CGPSC and High Court of Chhattisgarh; order dated 10-01-2025. Challenge to notification dated 5.7.2024 amending Rule 7 (eligibility: enrollment as an Advocate) of the CG Lower Judicial Service Rule 2006. Petition held defective (Rules not challenged, only amendment); dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh with proper prayer and pleadings. Keywords: withdrawal; defective prayer; Rule 7 amendment; lower judicial service eligibility; ADPPO; Chhattisgarh.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file it afresh with proper prayer and pleadings. ¶37

Dulesh Mrig Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:1642-DB

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 191 of 2025

¶6

1 - Dulesh Mrig Sahu S/o Rohit Sahu Aged About 28 Years Presently Working As Adppo, Office Of Deputy Director Of Prosecution Durg (C.G.). --- R/o G 01, Nyayik Karmchari Awasiya Parisar, Bhatgaon, District Balodabazar - Bhatapara (C.G.).

¶7

2 - Smt. Minaxhi Dewangan W/o S. K. Dewangan, Aged About 40 Years Presently Working As Adppo, Office Of Deputy Director Of Prosecution Dantewada (C.G.), --- Permanent R/o Behind J.L.N.D. College Purhenapara, Sakti District Sakti (C.G.).

¶8

3 - Sounak Verma S/o Dilip Verma Aged About 27 Years Presently Working As Assistant Public Prosecutor, Central Bureau Of Investigation, Kolkata (W B). --- Permanent R/o Ward No. 9, Amapara, Tahsil Mohla Manpur, District - Mohla - Manpur - Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.).

¶9

4 - Shruti Kamble D/o P.K. Kamble, Aged About 28 Years Presently Working As Adppo, Office Of Deputy Director Of Prosecution Surguja At Ambikapur (C.G.) ---- Permanent R/o H.No. 2/a, Road No. 73, Sector 6, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg (C.G.).

¶10

5 - Deepak Kumar Chandrakar, S/o C.P. Chandrakar Aged About 28 Years Presently Working As Adppo, Office Of Deputy Director Of Prosecution Raipur (C.G.) --- Permanent R/o C/o Chandrika Prasad Chndrakar, Pitiyajhar Daldali Road, Mahasamund (C.G.).

¶11

6 - Ghateshwari D/o Jait Ram Diwan Aged About 30 Years Presently Working As Adppo, Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.) --- Permanent R/o Ward No. 2, Shanti Nagar, Bagbahara, District Mahasamund (C.G.).

¶12

7 - Rahul Gupta S/o Nrayan Prasad Gupta, Aged About 27 Years Presently Working As Adppo, Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.), ---- R/o Shanti Nagar, Kansabel, District Jashpur (C.G.).

¶13

8 - Bhavana Khatwani, D/o Tarun Kumar Khatwani Aged About 28 Years Presently Working

¶14

¶15

As Adppo, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.), ---- R/o F-10 Dharampura No. 1 Near Doordarshan Office Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.).

¶16

9 - Ishu Deshmukh D/o Jai Jai Ram Deshmukh, Aged About 29 Years Presently Working As Law Officer Central Jail Durg (C.G.) --- Permanent R/o Lig 487 Housing Board Kohka Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.).

¶17

10 - Abhishek Singh Uikey S/o Hiraman Lal Uikey Aged About 27 Years Presently Working As Adppo, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.), ---- R/o Transit Hostel Room No. 21, Vrindavan Colony, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.).

¶18

... Petitioner(s)

¶19

versus

¶20

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary (Law), Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).

¶21

2 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, North Block, Sector - 19, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.).

¶22

3 - High Court Of Chhattisgarh Through Registrar General, Bodari, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.).

¶23

... Respondent(s)

¶24

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, G.A. (for Res. No. -1) Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate (for Res. No.-2) Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate (for Res. No. 3)

¶25

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶26

Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge

¶27

Order on Board

¶28

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 10-01-2025

¶29

The present petition has been filed seeking following relief(s):-

¶30

“ 10.1 Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record

¶31

pertaining to the instant case.

¶32

¶33

10.2 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and set aside the amendment which relates to enrollment as an Advocate in eligibility criteria in rule 7 in CG Lower Judicial Service Rule 2006 by notification dt. 5.7.2024, in the interest of Justice.

¶34

10.3 Any other relief which the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be provided to the petitioner. ”

¶35

The prayer made in the present petition appears to be defective one as has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondents that the rules has not been challenged and only the amendment is challenged in the petition.

¶36

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file it afresh with proper prayer.

¶37

In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to file it afresh with proper prayer and pleadings.

¶38

Sd/Sd/- ( Ravindra Kumar Agrawal ) ( Ramesh Sinha ) Judge Chief Justice

¶39

sagrika

Dulesh Mrig Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dulesh Mrig Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Boga Vs State of Chhattisgarh

S S Multi Services Proprietor Vs Union of India

Firdos Ahmad Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mukesh Kumar Thakur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Malti Rathore Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S. Abhiram Marketing Services Limited Vs Union of India