representation within a period of three weeks from today before the Collector, Bilaspur and the said authority shall in turn shall consider and decide the representation. In accordance with the order of the Hon'ble High court passed in WP(S) no 963 of 2020, Collector Bilaspur issued notice to the petitioner for the matter to be heard on 18.06.2020 and on 25.06.2020 but the petitioner was unable to appear on both the dates and thereafter the ex parte order has been passed against her by the Collector, Bilaspur on 25.06.2020 stating that the date of investigation report is based on which petitioner claims to be absolved of all the charges is unclear moreover the SHRC has the power to appoint or remove the Mitanins under the program and complaint of the SHRC being correct and the case of the petitioner is not maintainable. It is pertinent to mention here that the marriage of petitioner's son and daughter was to be solemnized at the relevant point of time, i.e. on 19.06.2020 and 22.06.2020, and therefore, on 02.06.2020 and 16.06.2020 her husband was granted permission for the said purpose from the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Bilaspur. It thus, appears that at the relevant point of time, the petitioner was engaged with regard to the solemnization of the marriage of her son and daughter, owing to which, she could not appear before the Court of Collector, Bilaspur on 18.06.2020 and was, therefore, proceeded ex parte on the said date. That, after proceeding ex parte on 18.06.2020, the final order was passed on 25.06.2020, which was challenged by the petitioner by filing WP(S) No.
