Dismissed¶16

Dahruram Dhruv v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC7 Sept 2025WPS/1363/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur — WPS No. 1363 of 2025 — Dahruram Dhruv v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors (Principal Secretary, Education Department; Divisional Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts and Pension, Bastar Division; Collector Bastar; District Education Officer, Bastar) — order dated 08/09/2025 by Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. — writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to total non-appearance despite repeated calls; morning mention had been made for withdrawal — NAFR; no merits adjudication, no directions, no quantum.

What the court decided

AI extract

Dahruram Dhruv Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶3

WPS No. 1363 of 2025

¶4

1 - Dahruram Dhruv S/o Late Shri Daslal Dhruv Aged About 62 Years Posted As Principal At Government Higher Secondary School Balenga, Block Bastar, District Bastar (Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Bhanpuri, Post Bhanpuri, Block Bastar, Distsrict Bastar (Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh

¶5

... Petitioner(s)

¶6

versus

¶7

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Dist.- Raipur, Cg.

¶8

2 - The Divisional Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pension Bastar, Division Jagdalpur, District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

3 - The Collector Bastar, District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

4 - The District Education Officer, Bastar, District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

... Respondent(s)

¶12

(Cause title taken from Case Information System)

¶13

Order Sheet

¶14

VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.08 17:56:55 +0530

¶15

08/09/2025	None appears for the petitioner.
	Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer for the State.
	In the morning, the matter was being mentioned for

¶16

withdrawal of the writ petition, therefore, listing of the case at the post lunch session. At the post lunch session, when repeatedly, no one appears to pursue the withdrawal of the writ petition. Since, the matter has been listed on	this Court ordered for the matter was called writ petition or prayer for a mention being made
by learned counsel for the petitioner, but o appears on behalf of the petitioner, the	n repeated calls, no one present writ petition is
dismissed for want of prosecution. (Ravind	Sd/- ra Kumar Agrawal) Judge

¶17

ved

Dahruram Dhruv v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Dahruram Dhruv v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pranav Kumar Garg Vs Manoj Kumar Pingua IAS

Lalaram Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Satyam Mahapatra Vs Union of India

Sumer Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dr. Kala Nand Choudhary Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Laddheram Chandrakar Vs Dr. B. L. Raj