Deepak Kumar Gharde Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

¶1

1

¶2

2025:CGHC:37382

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPS No. 1244 of 2025

¶6

1 - Deepak Kumar Gharde S/o Mr. Madhukar Gharde Aged About 43 Years Post Assistant Teacher Local Body, Posted At J.R.Dani Govt. Girls Utkrishth Hindi Medium School Raipur Block Dharsiwa Distt. Raipur Cg 2 - Mrs. Sweta Jha W/o Mr. Navin Kumar Jha Aged About 48 Years Post Teacher, (Local Body), Posted At J.R.Dani Govt. Girls Utkrishth Hindi Medium School Raipur Block Dharsiwa Distt. Raipur Cg 3 - Mrs. Gargi Sharma W/o Mr. Amit Sharma Aged About 39 Years Post Teacher, (Local Body), Posted At P.G.S.M. Govt. School Raipura, Block Dharsiwa Distt. Raipur Cg 4 - Mrs. Shilpi Tiwari W/o Mr. Ashish Sharma Aged About 38 Years Post Teacher, (Local Body), Posted At J.R.Dani Govt. Girls Utkrishth Hindi Medium School Raipur Block Dharsiwa Distt. Raipur Cg 5 - Mrs. Neelam Soni W/o Mr. Ritesh Kumar Soni Aged About 39 Years Post Teacher, (Local Body), Posted At J.R.Dani Govt. Girls Utkrishth Hindi Medium School Raipur Block Dharsiwa Distt. Raipur Cg 6 - Mrs. Swati Sharma W/o Mr. Anuj Kumar Sharma Aged About 41 Years Post Teacher, (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Boys Upper Primary School, Balodabazar, Block Mahasamund Distt. Mahasamund Cg 7 - Mrs. Najma Begam W/o Mr. Mohammad Sajid Aged About 48 Years Post Teacher, (Local Body), Posted At J.R.Dani Govt. Girls Utkrishth Hindi Medium School Raipur Block Dharsiwa Distt. Raipur Cg 8 - Mrs. Shalini Sahu W/o Mr. Rakesh Sahu Aged About 41 Years Post Teacher, (Local Body), Posted At J.R.Dani Govt. Girls Utkrishth Hindi Medium School Raipur Block Dharsiwa Distt. Raipur Cg 9 - Mrs. Neelima Sahu W/o Mr. Uttam Kumar Sahu Aged About 46 Years Post Teacher, (Local Body), Posted At Swami Atmanand Govt. Utkrishth Hindi Medium School Hathbandh Block Simga Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara Cg 10 - Mrs. Gayatri Verma W/o Mr. Tikendra Kumar Verma Aged About 42 Years Post Lecturer, (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Khokhopara, Raipur Block Dharsiwa Distt. Raipur Cg 11 - Mrs. Ankita Jain W/o Mr. Pranay Jain Aged About 39 Years Post Lecturer, (Local Body), Posted As Kashiram Sharma, Govt. Higher Secondary School Bhanpuri, Block Dharsiwa Distt. Raipur Cg

¶7

... Petitioner(s)

¶8

versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur Distt. Raipur Cg 2 - Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Distt. Raipur Cg 3 - District Education Officer District Mahasamund C.G 4 - District Education Officer District Raipur C.G 5 - District Education Officer Distt. Balodabazar Bhatapara Cg 6 - Zila Panchayat District Mahasamund Through Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat District Mahasamund Cg

¶9

2

¶10

7 - Zila Panchayat District Raipur Through Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat District Raipur Cg 8 - Zila Panchayat District Balodabazar Bhatapara Through Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat District Balodabazar Bhatapara Cg

¶11

... Respondent(s)

¶12

For Petitioner (s) : Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate. For State : Shri R.S. Marhas, Addl. Advocate General.

¶13

Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J

¶14

Order on Board

¶15

30.07.2025

¶16

1. The claim of the petitioners is with regard to grant of first and second Kramonnati Vetanman.

¶17

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of first Kramonnati and second Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023 has also consider the identical issue. Petitioners are also entitle for first Kramonnati Vetanman and second Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the respondents No. 2 & 3/competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024.

¶18

3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶19

4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to respondents No. 2 & 3/competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in

¶20

3

¶21

W.A. No.261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents No.2 & 3/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of this case. It is for the respondents No. 2 &

¶22

3 to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits.

¶23

5. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

Sd/(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge

¶25

inder

Deepak Kumar Gharde v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar Gharde v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neetu Lakra Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pinku Sharma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Madhuri Tukaram Wasnik Vs Union of India

Pradeep Singh Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ansul Kumar Thakur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shweta Tripathi Vs State of Chhattisgarh