Dismissed¶¶24

M/S Obra Cement Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC2 Jul 2025WPC/741/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Obra Cement Pvt Ltd v State of Chhattisgarh; WPC No. 739 of 2023 and WPC No. 741 of 2023; Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; Arvind Kumar Verma, J.; order dated 03.07.2025; neutral citation 2025:CGHC:30343 (NAFR); dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of petitioner's counsel on two calls; no merits decided; no costs or quantum; respondents represented by Satish Gupta, GA and Harshwardhan Parganiya, Advocate.

What did the court decide?

Both writ petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution, the Court having been left with no other option after none appeared for the petitioners on two calls for hearing. ¶¶25

M/S Obra Cement Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:30343

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 739 of 2023

¶6

M/s Obra Cement Pvt. Ltd. Through Authorized Signatory Asgar Qureshi, S/o Late Shri Sabir Qureshi, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Mayapur, Behind City Kotwali, Ambikapur District Sarguja (Chhattisgarh)

¶7

--- Petitioner(s)

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Mantralaya At Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

2 - Managing Director Public Health Engineering Department Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Jal Jeevan Mission Civil Lines Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

--- Respondent(s)

¶12

WPC No. 741 of 2023

¶13

M/s Obra Cement Pvt. Ltd. Through Authorized Singnatory - Asgar Qureshi, S/o Late Shri Sabir Qureshi, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Mayapur, Behind City Kotali, Ambikapur District - Sarguja (Chhattisgarh)

¶14

--- Petitioner(s)

¶15

Versus

¶16

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Mantralaya At Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.)

¶17

2 - Managing Director, Public Health Engineering Department Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Jal Jeevan Mission Civil Lines Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.)

¶18

	---Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) :	None.
For State :	Mr. Satish Gupta, GA
For Respondent No.2	Mr. Harshwardhan Parganiya, Advocate

¶19

¶20

Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge

¶21

Order on Board

¶22

03.07.2025

¶23

When the matters are called out for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Even in the second call, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

¶24

In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petitions for want of prosecution.

¶25

Accordingly, the above petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶26

CC as per rules.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

(Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge

¶29

J/-

M/S Obra Cement Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Obra Cement Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radheshyam Gond, Vs Ujjiwan Small Finance Bank

Sukhdas Kosale Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vrinda Prasad Khunte Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dhanushdhari Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vikram Singh Kushwaha Vs Regional Transport Authority

M/S Obra Cement Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Chhattisgarh