and taken possession of, however, the persons who were in possession of the land by way of constructing house, compensation was computed considering the area of super structure and accordingly compensation is paid to those persons. They also submits that petitioners have already admitted that Rs.50,000/- has been paid as compensation in lieu of superstructure constructed and possessed by petitioners and against the land recorded in the name of government measuring 97.964 hectare including the Khasra No. 627, total compensation of Rs.23,96,73,493/- is computed and deposited with the State Government. He placed relevant file along with the letter dated 30.05.2016 to the Collector mentioning the deposit of amount against the acquisition of land recorded in the name of State Government. It is also contended by learned counsel for respondent/SECL that respondents No.3 and 4 is giving training to the landless persons/persons, who were in possession of government land and also making an attempt to provide them alternate employment with contractors working under respondent No.3 and 4. Petitioners are not entitled for the relief of employment as claimed in Relief Clause No.10.1. So far as the relief as prayed for in Relief Clause No. 10.2 of monetary compensation is concerned, petitioner is also not entitled for monetary compensation as under rehabilitation Policy, respondents/ SECL have provided alternate place to petitioners with minimum amenities like road, drain and water supply.
