Dismissed¶25

M/S Shri Shiv Rice Mill v. Union of India

Chhattisgarh HC12 Nov 2025WPC/5471/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WPC No. 5471 of 2025, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 13.11.2025 by Judge Parth Prateem Sahu (NAFR). Writ petition by M/s Shri Shiv Rice Mill and Deepak Kumar Agrawal against Union of India, State of Chhattisgarh, MARKFED, Civil Supplies Corporation, Collector (Food) Sakti and Food Corporation of India dismissed as withdrawn after counsel reported the claimed grievances had been redressed; liberty reserved to file a fresh petition if exigency arises. No statutes, precedents or monetary figures involved.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition if any exigency arises in future. ¶25

M/S Shri Shiv Rice Mill Vs Union of India — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:55357

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 5471 of 2025

¶6

ALFIZA BAIG

¶7

Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2025.11.13 17:54:54 +0530

¶8

1 - M/s Shri Shiv Rice Mill (Mill Registration No. Ma549286) Address - Village Bodasagar (Faguram), Tahsil Adbhar, District Sakti (C.G.) Through - Its Partner, Deepak Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shri Ramcharan Agrawal, Aged Around 38 Years, (Aadhar No. - 3001 6891 5942) Resident Of H. No. 6/103, Dabhra Road, P.O. Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶9

2 - Deepak Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Ramcharan Agrawal Aged About 38 Years (Aadhar No. - 3001 6891 5942) Resident Of H. No. 6/103, Dabhra Road, P.O. Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.)

¶10

... Petitioners

¶11

versus

¶12

1 - Union Of India Through - Secretary, Ministry Of Consumer Affairs, Food And Public Distribution Department, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi

¶13

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶14

3 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Maryadit Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)

¶15

4 - Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Sakti, District Sakti (C.G.)

¶16

¶17

5 - Collector (Food Department) Sakti District Sakti (C.G.)

¶18

6 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Maryadit Sakti, District - Sakti (C.G.)

¶19

7 - Food Corporation Of India Through Its General Manager, Regional Office - Raipur, Mowa, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

¶20

8 - Food Corporation Of India Through Its Divisional Manager, Bilaspur, Divisional Office - Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶21

	... Respondents
For Petitioner	: Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate
For State	: Mrs. Upasana Mehta, Deputy Govt. Advocate
For Respondent no. 3 & 6	^:Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Vikram Sharma, Advocate
For Respondent no. 7 & 8	^:Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate
Hon'ble	Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge

¶22

Order On Board

¶23

13.11.2025

¶24

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the grievances as claimed in this writ petition by petitioner has already been redressed and, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh petition, if any exigency arises in future.

¶25

In view of the submission made by counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶26

Certified copy as per rules.

¶27

sd/-

¶28

(Parth Prateem Sahu)

¶29

JUDGE

¶30

alfiza

M/S Shri Shiv Rice Mill v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Shri Shiv Rice Mill v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukti Dal Women Self Help Group Jhalariya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vrishbhanu Kumar Tandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Harishankar Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jaya Agrawal (in Person ) Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S Shreem Engineer and Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs Irshad Khan

Shivmoy Datta (wrongly written as Sibamoy Datta) Vs State of Chhattisgarh