Dismissed¶26

Vijay Kumar Deshmukh v. Union of India

Chhattisgarh HC25 Jun 2025WPC/528/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; WPC No. 528 of 2024; Vijay Kumar Deshmukh v. Union of India and others; South East Central Railways (SECR), Bilaspur Zone; Senior Divisional Commercial Manager; impugned order dated 19/01/2024 bearing no.COM/BSP/NFR/OHA/SECVI/2024/933; petition dismissed as infructuous; grievance redressed; decided 26.06.2025; Coram: Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice and Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge (per Ramesh Sinha, C.J.); Petitioner's counsel: Sourabh Sahu, Advocate; Respondents' counsel: R. K. Mishra, DSGI with Rishabh Deo Singh, CGC.

What did the court decide?

The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, the petitioner's grievance having been redressed and nothing remaining in the petition to adjudicate. ¶26

Vijay Kumar Deshmukh Vs Union of India — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:28096-DB

SOURABH BHILWAR

Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.06.27 10:46:16 +0530

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

NAFR

¶7

WPC No. 528 of 2024

¶8

Vijay Kumar Deshmukh S/o Late Neelkanth Rao Deshmukh Aged About 43 Years Proprietor, Vijay Advisories And Consultancy C-15 Ground Floor Narayan Plaza Link Road Bilaspur, R/o Ews - 67, Nehru Nagar, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Railways, Rail Bhawan 1, Raisina Road, New Delhi, India

¶12

2 - South East Central Railways Through Its General Manager, Bilaspur Zone, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶13

3 - Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South East Central Railways, Bilaspur Zone, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶14

... Respondent(s)

¶15

(Cause title taken from CIS)

¶16

For Petitioner	: Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Advocate.
For Respondents/ UOI	: Mr. R. K. Mishra, DSGI alongwith Mr. Rishabh Deo Singh, CGC.

¶17

¶18

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge

¶19

Order on Board

¶20

Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice

¶21

26.06.2025

¶22

This has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following reliefs:- “10.1. That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 19/01/2024, passed by the respondent no.2, bearing no.COM/BSP/NFR/OHA/SECVI/2024/933.

¶23

10.2. Any other relief(s)/order(s)/direction(s) in favor of petitioner, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.

¶24

10.3. Cost of the petition.”

¶25

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present CRMP has become infructuous as the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and nothing remains in this petition to adjudicate.

¶26

In view of the above, the instant CRMP is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

(Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice

¶30

S. Bhilwar/ Rahul

Vijay Kumar Deshmukh v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar Deshmukh v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Kumar Garg Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhushan Nishad Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Yogesh Bharti @ Sonu Chauhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kamal Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Laxman Rathiya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Gopal Thakur Vs State of Chhattisgarh