The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue was decided.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Digitally signed by SIDDHANT SIDDHANTTAMRAKAR TAMRAKARDate:2025.07.09 09:36:13 +0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NAFR
WPC No. 471 of 2021
... Petitioner(s)
versus
... Respondent(s)
(Cause Title is taken from Case Information System)
| For Petitioner | : Mr. Atul Dave, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. |
|---|---|
| Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate | |
| For State | : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer |
| For Respondent No. 4 | : Mr. Anchal Kumar Matre, Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board
08.07.2025
Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge
$iddhant
Maa Sharda Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Doda
State Of Chhattisgarh
The Collector District Mungeli
The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Mungeli
Jago Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Pauni
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
