This order disposes of a writ petition challenging notices to remove forest land encroachment. The court granted liberty to petitioners to clarify they hold only permissible land.
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to inform the authority they have not exceeded permissible land area.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 3
2025:CGHC:3815
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPC No. 440 of 2025
1 - Ram Sai Yadav S/o Late Devnandan Yadav Aged About 77 Years R/o Village- Sonari, Tehsil- Sonhat And District- Korea (C.G.)
2 - Virendra Vikram Chand Yadav S/o Ram Sai Yadav Aged About 53 Years R/o Village - Sonari, Tehsil- Sonhat And District- Korea (C.G.)
3 - Nar Nahar Yadav S/o Ram Sai Yadav Aged About 51 Years R/o Village - Sonari, Tehsil- Sonhat And District- Korea (C.G.)
... Petitioners
versus
1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur (C.G.)
2 - The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur (C.G.)
3 - Office Of Deputy Forest Officer, North Baikunthpur, District- Koriya (C.G.)
4 - Office Of Forest Range Officer, Devgarh, District- Koriya (C.G.)
... Respondents
(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)
2 / 3
For Petitioners : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Adv. For Respondents/ State : Mr. S. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board
22/01/2025
3 / 3
Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE
$. Bhilwar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the notices regarding removal of encroachment were legitimate.
Ram Sai Yadav & Ors.
State of Chhattisgarh
Bibhu Datta Guru
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
