Dismissed¶36

Arun Kumar v. Jagmohan

Chhattisgarh HC8 Sept 2025WPC/2835/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal order: WPC No. 2835 of 2024, Arun Kumar & others v. Jagmohan & others (including Tehsildar, SDO (Revenue) and Collector, District Korea), High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 09.09.2025 by Arvind Kumar Verma, J. (single judge). Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a better constituted petition. Counsel: Shivam Agrawal for petitioners; Ajeet Singh, GA for Respondent-State. Marked NAFR. No issues on merits, no statutes or precedents cited, no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a better constituted petition. ¶36

Arun Kumar Vs Jagmohan — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:45882

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 2835 of 2024

¶6

1 - Arun Kumar S/o Late Sohanlal, Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kharwat (Mahuapara), Thana And Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh

¶7

2 - Rupendra Kumar S/o Late Sohanlal, Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Kharwat (Mahuapara), Thana And Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh

¶8

3 - Sonabai D/o Late Sohanlal, Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Kenapara, Thana And Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh

¶9

4 - Maanmati D/o Late Sohanlal, Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Harratikra, Thana Jayanagar, Tehsil Latori, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

¶10

5 - Shyamvati D/o Late Sohanlal, Aged About 32 Years R/o Odari, Thana And Tehsil Sonhat, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶11

6 - Dinesh Kumar S/o Manohar, Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Baraul, Thana And Tahsil Surajpur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

¶12

7 - Sunil Kumar S/o Manohar, Aged About 17 Years (Minor)through Guardian Father Manohar R/o Village Baraul, Thana And Tehsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

¶13

8 - Rajni D/o Manohar, Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Nawangiri, Thana And Tehsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

¶14

... Petitioner(s)

¶15

versus

¶16

1 - Jagmohan S/o Late Sukhram, Aged About 62 Years Caste Rajwar, R/o Village Nagar, Thana Charcha, Tehsil Baikunthpur,

¶17

¶18

District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶19

2 - Vijay S/o Late Sukhram, Caste Rajwar, Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Parihat, Thana And Tehsil Sonhat, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶20

3 - Sonamati D/o Late Sukhram, Caste Rajwar, Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Salgawan, Thana And Tehsil Sonhat District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶21

4 - Sanju Kumar S/o Late Rajkumar Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Kharwat (Mahuapara) Thana And Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶22

5 - Deepa D/o Late Rajkumar, R/o Village Kharwat (Mahuapara) Thana And Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶23

6 - Rani D/o Late Rajkumar, Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Kharwat (Mahuapara) Thana And Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶24

7 - Jitendra S/o Late Sukhram, Cast Rajwar, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Odari, Thana And Tehsil Sonhat, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶25

8 - Sunita D/o Late Sukhram, Caste Rajwar Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Odgi, Thana And Tehsil Sonhat, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶26

9 - Yashwant S/o Ramgopal, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Chirguda, Thana And Tehsil Patna, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶27

10 - Tehsildar, Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶28

11 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Baiknthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶29

12 - The Collector, District Korea Chhattisgarh.

¶30

... Respondent(s)

¶31

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners : Mr. Shivam Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Ajeet Singh, GA. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge

Order on Board

09.09.2025

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners contended that petitioners may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file the better constituted petition.

¶36

2. In view of above, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶37

CC as per rules.

¶38

Sd/(Arvind Kumar Verma)

¶39

Judge

¶40

J/-

Arun Kumar v. Jagmohan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Kumar v. Jagmohan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Death (Gopal Anant) Mahendra Singh Anant Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Yogeshwari Bai Dhruw Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/S. N.R. Marketings Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Arun Pati Tripathi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajesh Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dilip Chandrakar Vs Indu Yadaw