Smt. Chandarmati Vs State of Chhattisgarh

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur , Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Sarguja District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh

¶10

3 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Udaypur Sarguja, District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A.

¶12

Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge

¶13

Order on Board

¶14

09/07/2025

¶15

By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

¶16

“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly call for the records pertaining to case of the petitioner.

¶17

10.2 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the

¶18

respondent authorities to register the application dated

¶19

2

¶20

07.01.2025 preferred by the petitioner for mutation of her name in land records under Section 109 and 110 of C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959, in the interest of justice.

¶21

10.3 That, any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and fit in facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has purchased the land which is situated at Village-Sontarai, P.H. No. 12, Tahsil, Udaypur, bearing Khasra No. 664/13, area 0.202 hectare way back on 18.06.2002 for consideration of Rs. 20,000/- through registered sale deed, however, the petitioner could not got mutated the said land in his name. Thereafter, on 7^th January, 2025, the petitioner has moved an application before the Tahsildar, Udaypur, District- Sarguja, however, his application not registered by the then concerned Tahsildar and no orders have been passed.

¶23

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that if the petitioner has moved an application, the concerned Tahsildar should have registered the case and should have initiated the proceedings upon the demarcation as per Section 109 and Section 110 of C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959.

¶24

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶25

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the Tahsildar-Udaypur, District- Sarguja is

¶26

3

¶27

directed to consider the said application, register the same and to proceed further in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders within a period of 45 days. Since the application has been filed way back on 7^th January, 2025 as such the concerned Tahsildar is under obligation to register and decide the same in accordance with law.

¶28

With this observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of .

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

(Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE

¶31

Madhurima

Smt. Chandarmati v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Chandarmati v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrakant Prasad Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sewaram Panjwani Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Au Small Finance Bank Ltd. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Diljeet Kaur Chhabra Vs Sanjay Narang

Smt. Rashmi Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Satish Agrawal Vs State of Chhattisgarh