Dismissed¶20

Bharat v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC8 Jun 2025WPC/2509/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge order of the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (Arvind Kumar Verma, J., dated 09.06.2025) in WPC No. 2509 of 2025: petition dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioners' own request, with liberty reserved to file an appropriate application before an appropriate forum; counsel for Respondents 1-5 (State revenue functionaries) had pointed out an alternative remedy. No issues framed, no merits decided, no statutes or precedents cited. Citable only for its procedural outcome (withdrawal with liberty), not for any proposition of law.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file an appropriate application before an appropriate forum ¶20

Bharat Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:22572

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶5

WPC No. 2509 of 2025

¶6

1 - Bharat S/o Ramayan Suryavanshi Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Mudpar (B), Tahsil - Pamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2 - Ghasiram S/o Ramayan Suryavanshi Aged About 56 Years R/o Village- Mudpar (B), Tahsil - Pamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 - Chandrabhan S/o Ramayan Suryavanshi Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Mudpar (B), Tahsil - Pamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4 - Virvasak S/o Ramayan Suryavanshi Aged About 54 Years R/o Village- Mudpar (B), Tahsil - Pamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5 - Manmohan S/o Ramayan Suryavanshi Aged About 58 Years R/o Village- Mudpar (B), Tahsil - Pamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa (C.G.) 6 - Aman S/o Ghanaram Suryavanshi Aged About 50 Years R/o Village- Mudpar (B), Tahsil - Pamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa (C.G.)

¶7

7 - Rajkumar S/o Balchand Suryavanshi Aged About 68 Years R/o Village- Mudpar (B), Tahsil - Pamgarh, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)

¶8

... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2- Additional Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3- Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pamgarh, District- Janjgir-Champa C.G. 4- Tahsildar, TahsilPamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa C.G. 5- Naib Tahsildar, TahsilPamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa C.G. 6 - Chhoti Bai D/o Late Buddhu Aged About 30 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Rahauda, TahsilPamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa C.G. 7 - Meel Bai D/o Late Buddhu Aged About 55 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Giddha, TahsilNawagarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa C.G. 8 - Shiv Kumar S/o Late Buddhu Aged About 52 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Malhar, TahsilMasturi, DistrictBilaspur C.G. 9 - Manmati D/o Late Buddhu Aged About 50 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Pamgarh, TahsilPamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa C.G.

¶9

¶10

10 - Tulsi D/o Late Buddhu Aged About 48 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Pamgarh, TahsilPamgarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa C.G. 11 - Savita D/o Late Buddhu Aged About 46 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Kutra, TahsilNawagarh, DistrictJanjgir-Champa C.G.

¶11

12 - Anita D/o Late Buddhu Aged About 43 Years Caste- Satnami, R/o Village- Pendri, Tahsil- Masturi, District- Bilaspur C.G.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr. Mahant Kumar Jayswal, Advocate

¶14

For Respondent No. 1 to 5 : Mr.Praveen Das, Deputy Advocate General

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge

¶16

Order on Board

¶17

09.06.2025

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file an appropriate application.

¶19

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents contended that an alternative remedy is available to the petitioner.

¶20

Looking to the submission made by the respective parties, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application before an appropriate forum.

¶21

Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. sd/-

¶22

(Arvind Kumar Verma)

¶23

alfiza Judge

Bharat v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharat v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitin Samuel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bharat Lal Nirmalkar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Lata Vaidya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Kamin Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kapileshwar Duggal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Raju Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh