Ten Singh Rajput Vs State of Chhattisgarh

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.).

¶11

2 - Collector Janjgir Champa O/o Collector District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.).

¶12

3 - Tahsildar Tah. Nawagarh District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.).

¶13

4 - Narmada Bai W/o Shri Rampal R/o Vill. Bhaismundi Tah. Nawagarh District - Janjgir - Champa (C.G.).

¶14

... Respondent(s)

¶15

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Animesh Verma, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)/ State	:	Ms. Upasana Mehta, Panel Lawyer.

¶16

2

¶17

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶18

Order on Board

¶19

02/05/2025

¶20

By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

¶21

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the Petitioner for its kind perusal.

¶22

10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, direction thereby directing the respondents to take steps as per law and there circular to prevent illegal construction on the Kotwari Service Land as mentioned in the petition.

¶23

OR ALTERNATIVELY

¶24

That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, direction thereby directing the respondents to take appropriate action on the complaint/representation of the petitioner.

¶25

10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, direction thereby directing the respondents to prevent non-agricultural use of Kotwari land & to bring the land to its original state.

¶26

3

¶27

10.4 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the Respondent State to ensure the compliance of order/circular dated 12/06/2024 so far as the subject land is concerned. 10.5 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.”

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue his representation before the the competent authority.

¶29

No objection has been raised from other side.

¶30

Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.

¶31

Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

¶32

Raghu Jat

Ten Singh Rajput v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ten Singh Rajput v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanti Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Nohar Singh Sonwani Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Abhay Gautam Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Parvati Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shyam Pal Tamrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manharan Lal Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh