Sushil Agrawal v. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited
Chhattisgarh HCWPC/1123/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition listed for hearing of an interlocutory application by the petitioner's counsel seeking withdrawal of the Vakalatnama. The court considered the application and allowed it; no substantive relief in the writ petition was decided.
What did the court decide?
IA No.3/2025 seeking withdrawal of the petitioner's Vakalatnama was allowed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1123 of 2022
¶2
Sushil Agrawal Versus SECL & Ors
¶3
Order Sheet
¶4
| 17.09.2025 | Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Advocate for the Petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 & 2. |
|
| Mr. Prakhar Dutt, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anil Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.4. Heard on IA No.3/2025, application for withdrawal of_Vakalatnama_on behalf of the petitioner. |
|
| On due consideration, IA No.3/2025 is hereby | |
| allowed. | |
| Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge |
¶5
J/-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sushil Agrawal
- respondent
SECL
Coram
AI extract
Arvind Kumar Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPC/1123/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court