Subhash Sharma v. Abhishek Kumar Chand
Case brief
What is this about?
WP227 No. 45 of 2022, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, decided 19-08-2025 by Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey. Petitioner: Subhash Sharma (counsel: Hari Agrawal). Respondents: Abhishek Kumar Chand, Sunita Rani, Renu Kumari Chand, Rachna Kumari Manhi alias Rachna Kumari Chand (counsel: Prasoon Agrawal); Subhash Wintrade Pvt. Ltd. and its directors Umendra Singh Ridmal Singh, Daman Kumar Sarathi and Sagar; State of Chhattisgarh through District Collector Raipur (counsel: Sanjeev Agrawal, P.L.). Outcome: writ petition dismissed as infructuous by efflux of time on counsel's submission; no merits adjudication, no relief granted, no quantum involved; subject matter of the petition not disclosed in the available text.
What did the court decide?
Recording the counsel's submission that the petition had become infructuous by efflux of time, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.