Tikeshwar Prasad Dansena v. Bhuwan Lal
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur | Neutral citation 2025:CGHC:1326 | NAFR (non-reportable) | WP(227) No. 184 of 2017 | Tikeshwar Prasad Dansena v. Bhuwan Lal, Chinta Prasad, Gulabdas Vaishnav, Chhotulal Dansena, Ramlal Dansena, H.R. Dhritlahre, D.S. Rathore, P.K. Miri and Returning Officer (Panchayat) Block Dabhra | Dismissal of writ petition as infructuous by efflux of time on counsel's statement | Counsel: Tapan Chandra for petitioner (brief of T.K. Jha); none for respondents | Bench: Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J. | Order dated 08/01/2025 | No statutory provision or precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition WP(227) No. 184 of 2017 is dismissed, having become infructuous by efflux of time, on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner. ¶26