Smt. Shakuntala Kushwaha v. Vidyasagar Dubey
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court at Bilaspur; WP227 No. 129 of 2023; Shakuntala Kushwaha, Pawan Kushwaha & Anun Kumar Kushwaha (petitioners) v. Vidyasagar Dubey, Vimla Dubey, Lakhanlal Kashyap, Jagdish Kashyap, Smt. Ashabai, State of Chhattisgarh through Collector Bilaspur & T. N. Dubey (respondents). Single-judge order by Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J., dated 25.08.2025; neutral citation 2025:CGHC:42938; marked NAFR. Petition dismissed as infructuous on the statement of counsel for the petitioners that it had become infructuous by efflux of time. No statute or precedent cited; no amount involved.
What did the court decide?
Taking into consideration the statement made by counsel for the petitioners that by efflux of time the petition has become infructuous, the Court dismissed the petition as rendered infructuous. ¶25