Smt. Sandhya Tirki v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court writ appeals (WA 158/2024 lead; WA 166, 177, 179, 182, 183/2024) by NULM Community Organizers (COs) of Durg, Bhilai, Raipur, Bemetara, Raigarh, Sarangarh etc. against common Single Judge order 23.01.2024 in WP(S) 3135/2018 and connected petitions rejecting challenge to CEO-SUDA order 26.03.2018 and SUDA-Rajhans Consultants and Technocrat Pvt. Ltd. agreement 14.07.2016 outsourcing COs to private placement agencies (later Call Me Services) under Deendayal Antyoday Yojna-NULM; appellants contended scheme policy (UBSP, SJSRY, NULM) required direct contractual appointment except Technical Experts and that Single Judge wrongly decided on regularization/policy grounds. Respondent-SUDA (Pankaj Agrawal) submitted scheme not extended by Union of India beyond 31.03.2025 and agency contracts ended. Division Bench of Ramesh Sinha CJ and Arvind Kumar Verma J, by judgment per Ramesh Sinha CJ dated 08.04.2025, disposed of appeals directing preference in appointment to appellants if scheme continued/extended, whether through placement agencies or by SUDA on its own; interim order of 13.06.2024 vacated; relied on GoI Under Secretary clarification 14.03.2017 (Annexure R-2&3/5) permitting external agency engagement at SMMU/CMMU. No statute or precedent cited; no costs or monetary award; counsel: Raza Ali, Vikas Dubey (appellants), Sangharsh Pandey GA and Thakur DAG (State), Pankaj Agrawal (SUDA), Juhi Anguriya (private respondents).