The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed two second appeals for want of prosecution. The court had issued summons to the appellants for their appearance, which were served on their representatives, but the appellants chose not to appear. Subsequent attempts to contact them failed, leading to dismissal.
Dismissal of second appeals for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2025:CGHC:32017
s
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No. 555 of 2015
1. Punit Ram S/o Ramdas Teli, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Dumarpali, P. H. No. 4, R. I. C. And Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2. Mehattar S/o Bhagwano, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Dumarpali, P. H. No. 4, R. I. C. And Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
3. Mohit Ram S/o Sadhuram Teli, Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Dumarpali, P. H. No. 4, R. I. C. And Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.........Defendant 3 To 5, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
--- Appellant(s)
versus
1. Dharnidhar S/o Chaitram, Aged About 35 Years Caste - Teli, R/o Village Dumarpali, P. H. No. 4, R. I. C. And Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2. Narendra S/o Chaitram, Aged About 30 Years Caste - Teli, R/o Village Dumarpali, P. H. No. 4, R. I. C. And Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
3. Madhusudan S/o Chaitram, Aged About 28 Years Caste - Teli, R/o Village Dumarpali, P. H. No. 4, R. I. C. And Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
4. Hara Bai Wd/o Chaitram, Aged About 56 Years Caste - Teli, R/o Village Dumarpali, P. H. No. 4, R. I. C. And Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
5. Siro Bai D/o Deepsay, Aged About 71 Years Caste - Teli, R/o Village Dumarpali, P. H. No. 4, R. I. C. And Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh...........Plaintiffs, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
Digitally signed by MANISH MANISH YADAV YADAV Date: 2025.07.14 11:16:05 +0530
2
6. Shivprasad S/o Deepsay, Aged About 68 Years Caste - Teli, R/o Village Dumarpali, P. H. No. 4, R. I. C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.........Defendant No. 1, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
7. Tejram S/o Deepsay, Aged About 56 Years Caste - Teli, R/o Village Dumarpali, P. H. No. 4, R. I. C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh............Defendant No. 2, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
8. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.........Defendant No. 6...........Plaintiffs, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
SA No. 73 of 2016
1. Shivprasad S/o Deepsay, Aged About 68 Years R/o Vill.- Dumarpali, P.H. No.4, R.I.C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, Dist.Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2. Tejram S/o Deepsay, Aged About 56 Years R/o Vill.- Dumarpali, P.H. No.4, R.I.C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, Dist.Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ...........Defendants, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
--- Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Dharnidhar S/o Late Chaitram, Aged About 35 Years R/o Vill.Dumarpali, P.H. No.4, R.I.C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, Dist.- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2. Narendra S/o Late Chaitram, Aged About 30 Years R/o Vill.Dumarpali, P.H. No.4, R.I.C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, Dist.- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
3. Madhusudan S/o Late Chaitram, Aged About 28 Years R/o Vill.Dumarpali, P.H. No.4, R.I.C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, Dist.- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
4. Hara Bai W/o Late Chaitram, Aged About 56 Years R/o Vill.Dumarpali, P.H. No.4, R.I.C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, Dist.- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
3
5. Siro Bai D/o Deepsay, Aged About 71 Years R/o Vill.- Dumarpali, P.H. No.4, R.I.C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, Dist.Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
6. Punit Ram S/o Ramdas Teli, Aged About 42 Years R/o Vill.Dumarpali, P.H. No.4, R.I.C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, Dist.- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ...........Plaintiffs, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgar
7. Mahattar S/o Bhagwano, Aged About 35 Years R/o Vill.- Dumarpali, P.H. No.4, R.I.C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, Dist.Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
8. Mohit Ram S/o Sadhuram Teli, Aged About 38 Years R/o Vill.Dumarpali, P.H. No.4, R.I.C. And Tahsil Saraipali, Post Patsendri, Dist.- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
9. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through- Collector, Dist.- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ...........Def. No. 3 To 5, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s) : None For Respondent : Mr. Nikhil Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of No. 4 to 6 in SA No. Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate 73/2016 For State Mr. Kishanl Lal Sahu, Dy. Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Judgment on Board
10.07.2025
4
therefore, the matter was adjourned to 07.07.2025. On that day the case remained in not reach cases list, therefore, the case has taken up for hearing today but none appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants despite repeated calls.
Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Manish
1 issue framed by the court
Whether second appeals should be allowed when appellants fail to appear despite issuing special procedural codes (SPC).
Punit Ram S/o Ramdas Teli
Dharnidhar S/o Chaitram
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
