Manglin Bai v. Puranlal
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of appellants. One appellant deceased, notice served on the other who failed to appear.
What the court decided
1
2025:CGHC:51457
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No. 706 of 2017
1 - Manglin Bai W/o Parbhu Mahar, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Sutiya, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh
2 - Sewati Bai, W/o Lala Mahar, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Sutiya, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh , District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
versus
1 - Puranlal S/o Konda Mahar, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Singarghat, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh , Chhattisgarh
2 - Krishna Kumar S/o Puranlal Mahar, Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Singarghat, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh , District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Manglin Bai
- appellant
Sewati Bai
- respondent
Puranlal
- respondent
Krishna Kumar
- respondent
Manohar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/706/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court