Smt. Suchitra Bhatacharya v. Smt. Laxmi Thakur
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant was absent when called twice.
Second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant was absent when called twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2025:CGHC:34332
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No. 57 of 2020
Smt. Suchitra Bhatacharya W/o Late Kunal Bhatacharya Aged About 63 Years R/o Bodhghat Colony Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
... Appellant
versus
Smt. Laxmi Thakur W/o Late Subhash Thakur Aged About 58 Years R/o Aashram Road, Dharampura No. 01, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
... Respondent
(Cause title is taken from Case Information System)
For Appellant : None present For Respondent : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Order on Board
18/07/2025
1. On previous date of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Today also, even after the case was called out for hearing in the second round, none appeared for the appellant, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution.
2. Accordingly, second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
JUDGE
amit
Digitally
AMITKUMAR signed byAMIT KUMARDUBEYDate:
DUBEY 2025.07.2311:08:13
+0530
2
({JUDGE_NAME}) JUDGE
PSName
Smt. Suchitra Bhatacharya
Smt. Laxmi Thakur
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court