Dismissed¶33

Bhagau v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr.

Chhattisgarh HC16 Dec 2025SA/513/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of second appeals for want of prosecution (non-appearance of appellants) before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur on 17.12.2025; appellants also absent on 10.10.2025. Appellants/applicants: Bhagau; LRs of deceased Santosh Kumar (Munni Bai, Tankeshwar, Amritlal, Toshram); Nandlal. Respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (through Collector/Jiladhyaksh, Janjgir) and Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Keribandha, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa. Govt. Advocate Arvind Dubey for the State. No statutes, precedents, issues, merits or monetary quantum involved; purely a default dismissal of SA Nos. 512, 513 and 514 of 2013.

What did the court decide?

Despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the appellants to pursue the appeals and no representation was made on their behalf. ¶33

Bhagau Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr. — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signed by SAGRIKA SAGRIKA AGRAWAL AGRAWAL Date: 2025.12.17 19:08:24 +0530

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

SA No. 513 of 2013

¶5

1 - Bhagau S/o Baisakhu Aged About 34 Years R/o Keribandha, Thana And Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., Chhattisgarh

--- applicant

(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr. S/o Thru- Collector, Janjgir, Distt. JanjgirChampa C.G., Chhattisgarh

¶10

2 - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat- Keribandha, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶11

--- Respondent(s)

¶12

SA No. 512 of 2013

¶13

1 - Santosh Kumar (Died Through Lrs) As Per Honble Court Order Dated 20-072023

¶14

1.1 - Smt. Munni Bai Wd/o Late Santosh Kumar Aged About 34 Years R/o Gram Telibandha, Post Office - Arjuni Thana Evam Tahsil - Sakti, Jila (Rajasva Evam Civil) Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

¶15

¶16

1.2 - Tankeshwar S/o Santosh Kumar Aged About 30 Years R/o Gram Telibandha, Post Office - Arjuni Thana Evam Tahsil - Sakti, Jila (Rajasva Evam Civil) Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

¶17

1.3 - Amritlal S/o Santosh Kumar Aged About 17 Years Minor Through Mother Munni Bai Wd/o Late Santosh Kumar, R/o Gram Telibandha, Post Office - Arjuni Thana Evam Tahsil - Sakti, Jila (Rajasva Evam Civil) Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

¶18

1.4 - Toshram S/o Santosh Kumar Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Mother Munni Bai Wd/o Late Santosh Kumar, R/o Gram Telibandha, Post Office - Arjuni Thana Evam Tahsil - Sakti, Jila (Rajasva Evam Civil) Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

¶19

---applicant(s)

¶20

Versus

¶21

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Dwara Jiladhyaksh Janjgir Rajasva Evam Civil Jila - Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh

¶22

2 - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat- Keribandha, Tah. Sakti, Rajasva Avam Civil Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G.

¶23

--- Respondent(s)

¶24

SA No. 514 of 2013

¶25

1 - Nandlal S/o Kunji Ram Aged About 40 Years R/o Keribandha, Thana And Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., Chhattisgarh

¶26

---applicant(s)

¶27

Versus

¶28

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr. S/o Thru- Collector, Janjgir, Distt. JanjgirChampa C.G., Chhattisgarh

¶29

2 - Sarpanch Gram Panchayat- Keribandha, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶30

--- Respondent(s)

¶31

¶32

Order on Board

¶33

17/12/2025	None for the appellants in two rounds.
	Mr. Arvind Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the Respondent/ State. It transpires from the order sheet dated 10.10.2025 that on that day, no one appeared on behalf of the appellants when the case was taken up for hearing, today also, on repeated call no one appeared to pursue the appeal and no representation has been made on behalf of the appellants. Since, no one appeared on behalf of the appellants and no representation has been made, all the present second appeals (SA No. 513/2013, SA No. 512/2013 and SA No. 514/2013) are dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal ) Judge
sagrika

17/12/2025

None for the appellants in two rounds.

Mr. Arvind Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the Respondent/
State.
It transpires from the order sheet dated 10.10.2025 that
on that day, no one appeared on behalf of the appellants when
the case was taken up for hearing, today also, on repeated call
no one appeared to pursue the appeal and no representation
has been made on behalf of the appellants.
Since, no one appeared on behalf of the appellants and
no representation has been made, all the present second
appeals (SA No. 513/2013, SA No. 512/2013 and SA No.
514/2013) are dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
)
Judge

sagrika

Bhagau v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagau v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Prasad Vs Santosh Sahu and Ors.

Makhmohan Vs Mahamani Bai and Ors.

Asha Ram Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Santosh Kumar (Died through Lrs) Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Janak Bai Vs Sushil

Chhagan And Anr. Vs Babulal And Ors.