Dismissed¶25

Laxmi Prasad and Anr. v. Ghasiya Ram and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC7 Oct 2025SA/483/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; SA No. 483 of 2013; second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution / for default; repeated non-appearance of appellants and private respondents (17.07.2025, 18.09.2025, 08/10/2025); SPC returned unserved; appellants' change of address (Shivrinarayan, Janjgir-Champa) not on record; Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu; marked NAFR; no merits adjudication, no statutory provisions or precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Neither the appellants nor the private respondents appeared when the matter was listed on successive occasions, and the SPC sent to the appellants at their cause-title address was returned unserved, with no address of their changed residence available. ¶23

Laxmi Prasad and Anr. Vs Ghasiya Ram and Ors. — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:50190

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

SA No. 483 of 2013

¶6

1 - Laxmi Prasad S/o Ghasiya Ram Kahara Aged About 52 Years

¶7

2 - Ram Kripale S/o Laxmi Prasad Kahara Aged About 26 Years Both are R/o Purgaw, Tah. Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur Now Civil And Revenue Distt. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara C.G.

¶8

--- Appellants

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - Ghasiya Ram S/o Jhunau Kahara Aged About 71 Years

¶11

2 - Ramnarayan S/o Ghasiya Kahara Aged About 41 Years

¶12

3 - Krishna Kumar S/o Ram Narayan Kahara Aged About 21 Years

¶13

4 - Gopal Prasad S/o Ram Narayan Kahara Aged About 20 Years No.1 to 4 all are R/o Purgaw, Tah. Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur Now Civil And Revenue Distt. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara C.G.

¶14

5 - State Of Chhattisgarh S/o Thru- The Collector, Raipur Now Collector, Revenue And Civil Distt. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara C.G.

¶15

6 - Mukund Ram Kalar S/o Ramlal Aged About 48 Years R/o Purgaw, Tah. Bilaigarh, Distt. Raipur Now Civil And Revenue Distt. Baloda BazarBhatapara C.G.

¶16

--- Respondents

¶17

For Appellants : None for appellants For Respondent-State : Mr. Kishan Lal Sahu, Dy.G.A.

¶18

SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board

¶19

BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.10.09 11:03:04 +0530

¶20

08/10/2025

¶21

There was no representation on behalf of appellants on 17.07.2025. This Court issue fixed date SPC for appearance of appellants, thereafter, the case was listed on 18.09.2025 and again no one appeared on behalf of appellants or the private respondents. Case was adjourned for listing in the month of October, 2025. Today also

¶22

¶23

there is no representation on behalf of appellants or private respondents.

¶24

Perusal of the office report would show that SPC sent to appellants on their address as mentioned in the cause title of appeal, is returned unserved with a note that they are not residing in given address but as per information gathered they are residing at Shivrinarayan, JanjgirChampa. There is no address of appellants of their change of place of residence.

¶25

In the aforementioned facts of the case, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶26

Sd/(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge

¶27

Balram

Laxmi Prasad and Anr. v. Ghasiya Ram and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laxmi Prasad and Anr. v. Ghasiya Ram and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharma Agencies and Another Vs Abdul Salim and Others

Durgesh Pal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Nirmala Yadav Vs Amit Kumar Verma

Bharthari Lal Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Indra Kumar Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Arti Choubey Vs State of Chhattisgarh