Dismissed¶29

Sukhdev v. Smt. Bisantinbai

Chhattisgarh HC17 Sept 2025SA/417/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of second appeal for want of prosecution; appellant absent and unresponsive; counsel Abhishek Sharma pleaded no instructions despite registered-letter follow-up and warning of consequences; registered letter, postal track record and postal receipt placed on record; Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; S.A No.417 of 2020; decided 18.09.2025; Judge: Deepak Kumar Tiwari.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, the appellant having failed to give instructions to or contact his counsel despite a registered letter and warning of consequences of non-appearance. ¶29

Sukhdev Vs Smt. Bisantinbai — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:47978

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

S.A No.417 of 2020

¶6

Sukhdev S/o Shri Umendi Sahu (wrongly mentioned as Amendi Sahu) Aged About 57 Years Residence Of Village Baldevpur Police Station And Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh

¶7

... Appellant/Plaintiff

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - Smt. Bisantinbai W/o Mayaram Sahu Aged About 60 Years Residence Of Village Baldevpur Police Station And Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶10

2 - Smt. Tirith Kunwarbai W/o Mangilal Sahu Aged About 55 Years Residence Of Village Jurlakala Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶11

3 - Smt. Sukhbatibai W/o Shivlal Sahu Aged About 65 Years Residence Of Village Mudhipara Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶12

SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA

¶13

Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2025.09.18 16:22:27 +0530

¶14

4 - Beniram S/o Umendi Sahu Aged About 65 Years Residence Of Village Baldevpur Police Station And Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶15

¶16

5 - Santram S/o Beniram Sahu Aged About 35 Years Residence Of Village Baldevpur Police Station And Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh

¶17

6 - Smt. Sona Bai W/o Hansram Aged About 50 Years Residence Of Village Baldevpur Police Station And Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶18

7 - Gajendra Ram S/o Hansram Aged About 19 Years Residence Of Village Baldevpur Police Station And Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶19

8 - Laxmibai D/o Hansram Aged About 17 Years Minor (At Present Major) Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sona Bai, residence Of Village Baldevpur Police Station And Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶20

9 - Rinki Bai D/o Hansram Aged About 15 Years Minor (At Present Major) Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sona Bai, residence Of Village Baldevpur Police Station And Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶21

10 - Pinki Bai D/o Hansram Aged About 15 Years Minor (At Present Major) Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Sona Bai, residence Of Village Baldevpur Police Station And Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶22

11 - Gyanchand S/o Late Surajmal Jain Aged About 55 Years Residence Of Heeramoti Line Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

¶23

¶24

12 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent/Defendants

¶25

For Appellant :None.
For Respondent No.11 :Shri Vivek Chopda, Advocate. For Respondent No.12/State :Ms. Mandwi Bharadwaj, PL.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari
Judgment on Board

¶26

18.09.2025

¶27

Shri Abhishek Sharma, Advocate appears and pleads no instructions. He submits that albeit he has sent a registered letter to the Appellant seeking instructions to pursue the Appeal further, but he could neither receive any such instructions nor has been contacted by the Appellant in spite of warning him about the consequences of non-appearance. He has also shown the copy of registered letter sent by him along with the postal track record and the receipt of postal Department.

¶28

Reader of the Court is directed to place the aforementioned documents on record.

¶29

In these circumstances, the instant Appeal is dismissed for

¶30

want of prosecution.

¶31

Sd/-

¶32

(Deepak Kumar Tiwari) JUDGE

¶33

Priya

Sukhdev v. Smt. Bisantinbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukhdev v. Smt. Bisantinbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baidyanath Vs Smt. Jamuna Bai

Nirmala Bai Vs Jivan Sahu

Santosh Kumar Gupta Vs State Govt. of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Sanjana @ Manisha Jaiswal Vs Jaiprakash Diksena

Madan Lal Sahu, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Purnendra Kumar Netam Vs State of Chhattisgarh