Ramsahai v. Parvati
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as appellants were absent and unrepresented despite repeated calls.
What the court decided
1
2025:CGHC:40872
Digitally signed by AYUSHI AYUSHI SINGH SINGH Date: 2025.08.14 10:56:20 +0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NAFR
SA No. 258 of 2020
1- Ramsahai W/o Late Rupan Sao Aged About 69 Years
2- Devvishanu S/o Late Ramsahai Aged About 44 Years
3- Vishwanath S/o Ramsahai Aged About 41 Years All R/o Village And Tahsil Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh
... Appellants
versus
1 - Parvati D/o Late Rupan Sao Aged About 51 Years R/o Vill- Gumgara, Tah. Lakhanpur, DistrictSurguja, Chhattisgarh 2 - Mannmati D/o Late Rupan Sao Aged About 51 Years R/o Vill- Korja, Tah. Lakhanpur, DistrictSurguja, Chhattisgarh 3 - Rampati S/o Late Rupan Sao R/o Vill Salka, P.S. And Tahsil Premnagar, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No. 4)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramsahai W/o Late Rupan Sao
- appellant
Devvishanu S/o Late Ramsahai
- appellant
Vishwanath S/o Ramsahai
- respondent
Parvati D/o Late Rupan Sao
- respondent
Mannmati D/o Late Rupan Sao
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/258/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court