Dismissed¶23
Dashrath Satnami v. Ghasiram And Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCSA/173/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Non-prosecution dismissal. In SA No. 173 of 2013 (Dashrath Satnami versus Ghasiram, dead, through legal heirs Toran, Nohar, David, Kaushal and Smt. Puniya Bai, and the Govt. of C.G.), the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, by order dated 06.03.2025 (Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J.), dismissed the second appeal for want of prosecution after no appearance for the appellant even in the second call. Counsel column records none for the petitioner/appellant; Ms. Anuradha Jain appeared for the State. No merits discussion, no citation of statutes or cases. Source carries neutral citation line 2025:CGHC:11247 and the marking NAFR.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared for the appellant even at the second call. ¶22