Jaipal, v. Government of M.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; REVP No. 191 of 2020; decided 15.09.2025 (2025:CGHC:47197-DB); Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal & Radhakishan Agrawal, JJ. Review petition against Division Bench order dated 12.08.2010 in WA No. 254/2010 dismissed for want of any error apparent on the face of the record. Underlying litigation: WPS No. 3602/2005 (Single Judge, 09.04.2010) concerning a daily-wage appointee later regularised without following the constitutional process, relief denied in view of Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi (3) (2006) 4 SCC 1; Government of Andhra Pradesh v. K. Brahmanandam (2008) 5 SCC 241; Official Liquidator v. Dayanand (2008) 10 SCC 1. Keywords: review jurisdiction, error apparent on face of record, daily wage appointment, regularization, recall of order, Umadevi.
What did the court decide?
After hearing counsel and going through the order under review, the Court found no error apparent on the face of the record warranting exercise of review jurisdiction, and accordingly dismissed the review petition.