Allowed¶¶26
Ayodhya Prasad v. Kamal Kumar
Chhattisgarh HCMCC/814/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Condonation of delay; restoration of first appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; sufficient cause; 241 days delay; MCC No. 814 of 2024; First Appeal No. 225/2016; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Division Bench; order dated 10.01.2025; Ayodhya Prasad applicant; Kamal Kumar non-applicant; Siddharth Pandey advocate.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of the delay of 241 days in filing the MCC and restoration of First Appeal No. 225/2016 to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. ¶¶26