M/S K. Chandrasekhar Rao, v. Union of India

Chhattisgarh HC2 Jan 2025MCC/699/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court Bilaspur; MCC No.699 of 2024; disposed 03/01/2025; applicant M/s K. Chandrasekhar Rao (proprietor K. Chandrasekhar Rao); respondents Union of India (Ministry of Finance) and State of Chhattisgarh PWD officers; counsel Harsh Wardhan, Akhilesh Kumar (GA), Jyoti Singh for R. K. Mishra (DSG); Justice Rajani Dubey; disposed of with liberty to file contempt petition before appropriate forum; no statutory or precedent citations; no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the applicant to file a contempt petition before the appropriate forum. ¶¶24

M/S K. Chandrasekhar Rao, Vs Union of India — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:428

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

Digitally signed by RAMAKANT NIRALA

¶6

MCC No.699 of 2024

¶7

1 - M/s K. Chandrasekhar Rao, Having Its Office At H. No.203, Gulmohar, D. M. Vatika, Kachna Road, Kamardih, District - Raipur (C.G.), Through Its Proprietor Shri K. Chandrasekhar Rao, S/o. Late Shri K. Sreeramulu, Aged About 62 Years, R/o. H.No. 203, Gulmohar, D.M. Vatika, Kachna Road, Kamardih, District - Raipur (C.G.)

¶8

Applicant

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance And Corporate Affairs, Department Of Revenue, 3rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, New Delhi, 110001

¶11

2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

3 - The Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.)

¶13

4 - Engineer-In-Chief, Public Works Department, Raipur (C.G.)

¶14

5 - Chief Engineer, P.W.D., Bridge Zone, Raipur (C.G.)

¶15

6 - Superintending Engineer, P.W.D., Bridge Zone, Raipur (C.G.)

¶16

7 - Executive Engineer, P.W.D., Bridge Construction Division, Durg (C.G.)

¶17

Respondent(s)

¶18

For Applicant	: Mr. Harsh Wardhan, Advocate
For Respondent-State	: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, GA
For Respondent UOI	: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R. K. Mishra, DSG

¶19

Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

Order on Board

03/01/2025

At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he wishes to file contempt petition before the appropriate forum, therefore, the MCC may kindly be disposed of with liberty to file contempt petition before the appropriate forum.

¶24

In view of the statement made, the MCC is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

Rajani Dubey Judge

¶27

Nirala

M/S K. Chandrasekhar Rao, v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S K. Chandrasekhar Rao, v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Atmaram Jaiswal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Mukesh Kumar Choudhari Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Maheshwari Sahu Vs The State Of Chhattisgarh

Onkar Prasad Mishra Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Shiv Prashad Rajwade Vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited

Darasi Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh