Urmila Baiga v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Restoration of writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; WPS No. 5241 of 2009 restored to original number; MCC No. 545 of 2025; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; dismissal dated 24.07.2024; order dated 16.06.2025 by Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J.; cost of Rs. 1,000/- to Library Fund, High Court Bar Association, Bilaspur; applicant Urmila Baiga; counsel Ashish Shrivastava (Sr. Adv.), Udit Khatri, Shailja Shukla (Dy. Govt. Adv.); respondents include State of Chhattisgarh, Department of School Education, Adim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Anusuchit Janjati Praman Patra Uccha Stariya Chhanbin Samiti, Collector Bilaspur, District Education Officer Bilaspur.
What did the court decide?
Restoration of WPS No. 5241 of 2009 to its original number, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 1,000/- payable to the Library Fund, High Court Bar Association, Bilaspur.