Allowed¶21

Santosh Kumar Sahu v. Govind Bhai Patel

Chhattisgarh HC10 Jul 2025MCC/437/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur; neutral citation 2025:CGHC:32304; MCC No. 437 of 2025; Santosh Kumar Sahu & Anr. v. Govind Bhai Patel; restoration of first appeal F.A. No. 281/2018 previously dismissed by peremptory order dated 23.01.2025; application allowed on 11.07.2025; tagged NAFR; advocates: D.N. Prajapati for applicants, Shivangi Agrawal (for Manoj Paranjape) for respondent.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of F.A. No. 281/2018 to its original number. ¶21

Santosh Kumar Sahu Vs Govind Bhai Patel — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

-1-

2025:CGHC:32304

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶5

MCC No. 437 of 2025

¶6

1 - Santosh Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Shri Chintaram Sahu, Aged About 45 Years, At Present R/o House No. A/1669, Kaveri Vihar, NTPC Jamnipali, Korba (C.G.), Permanent R/o Village- Sankri, Post- Chandi, Tahsil- Abhanpur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶7

2 - Ankit Kumar S/o Shri Santosh Kumar Sahu, Aged About 20 Years, At Present R/o House No. A/1669, Kaveri Vihar, NTPC Jamnipali, Korba, Permanent R/o Village- Sankri, Post- Chandi, Tahsil- Abhanpur, District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶8

... Applicants

¶9

versus

¶10

1 - Govind Bhai Patel, S/o Shri Ramji Bhai Patel, Aged About 60 Years, C/o Royal Tiles Indira Timber Market, Banpuri, Tahsil & District- Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)

¶13

For Applicants	: Mr. D.N. Prajapati, Advocate.
For Respondent	: Ms. Shivangi Agrawal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manoj Paranjape, Advocate.

¶14

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey & Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

¶15

Order on Board

¶16

-2-

¶17

Per Rajani Dubey, J 11.07.2025

¶18

Heard Mr. D.N. Prajapati, learned counsel for the applicants and Ms. Shivangi Agrawal, learned counsel for respondent.

¶19

The present MCC has been filed by the applicant for restoration of F.A. No. 281/2018, which was dismissed by virtue of peremptory order dated 23.01.2025.

¶20

Learned counsel for respondent formally opposed the application.

¶21

For the reason mentioned in the application, same is allowed and F.A. No. 281/2018, which was dismissed by virtue of peremptory order dated 23.01.2025 be restored in its original number.

¶22

Sd/- Sd/(Rajani Dubey) (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Judge

¶23

Digitally signed by pekde VIJAY BHARATRAO PEKDE

Santosh Kumar Sahu v. Govind Bhai Patel

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar Sahu v. Govind Bhai Patel

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Sajid Vs Tabassum Afroj

Kishnchand Khubchandani Vs Smt. Prabha Agrawal

Trilokchandra Siadara Vs Smt. Vidyawati Kashyap

Smt. Abhilasha Awasthi Vs Samarth Awasthi