Allowed¶21

Kusum Deepak Xalxo v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC2 Apr 2025MCC/298/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration of writ petition WP(S) No.3393 of 2017 dismissed for non-prosecution on 19/02/2025; MCC No. 298 of 2025, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; applicant Kusum Deepak Xalxo; respondents: State of Chhattisgarh (Law & Legislative Department), Registrar General, Family Court Jashpur; counsel: Tapan Kumar Chandra (applicant), Atanu Ghosh Dy. Govt. Advocate (State), Prasoon Bhaduri (Non-applicants 2 & 3); Single Bench Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal; order dated 03/04/2025; petition restored to original number; no cost; neutral citation 2025:CGHC:15752.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of WP(S) No.3393 of 2017 to its original number; MCC disposed of with no orders as to cost. ¶21

Kusum Deepak Xalxo Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

2025:CGHC:15752

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶5

MCC No. 298 of 2025

¶6

1 - Kusum Deepak Xalxo, S/o Shri Kurlus Xalxo, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Aurajor, Post Harradand, P.S. Kunkuri, District Jashpur (C.G.)

¶7

... Applicant

¶8

versus

¶9

1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Law And Legislative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, (C.G.)

¶10

2 - The Registrar General, High Court Of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶11

3 - The Family Court, Through Its Presiding Officer, Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.)

¶12

	... Non-applicant(s)
For Applicant	: Shri Tapan Kumar Chandra, Advocate.
For the State/Non-applicant	: Shri Atanu Ghosh, Dy. Govt. Advocate.
No.1
For Non-applicants No.2 & 3	: Shri Prasoon Bhaduri, Advocate.

¶13

Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal

¶14

Order on Board

¶15

03/04/2025

¶16

Heard on admission.

¶17

This MCC has been filed for restoration of petition, being WP(S) No.3393 of 2017, which was dismissed for non-prosecution by this Court vide order dated 19/02/2025.

¶18

For the reasons assigned in the application for restoration of the said petition, which is duly supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same.

¶19

NARESHKUMARKAMDE Digitally signedby NARESHKUMAR KAMDEDate:2025.04.0410:37:25 +0530

¶20

¶21

Accordingly, the instant M.C.C. is allowed and disposed of and the petition being WP(S) No.3393 of 2017 is directed to be restored to its original number.

¶22

No orders as to cost.

¶23

Sd/( Sanjay S. Agrawal ) JUDGE

¶24

Kamde

Kusum Deepak Xalxo v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kusum Deepak Xalxo v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. S. Eh. Alternative And Naturopathy Yoga Science Medical College Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Narayan Sarkar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Mahesh Kumar Dhruv Vs Vice-Chancellor

Narendra Singh Verma, Vs Vijay Jangde

Smt. Jaya Rajan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manish Trading Company Vs the Union of India