Subhagiya v. Ramprasad

Chhattisgarh HC5 Feb 2025MCC/128/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur — MCC No. 128 of 2025 — Subhagiya, Sulendar, Shyampati and Devanti (applicants) v. Ramprasad and State of Chhattisgarh (non-applicants) — withdrawal of miscellaneous case with liberty to file better constituted application — dismissed as withdrawn — Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey — 06/02/2025 — procedural order, no merits adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the MCC with liberty to file a better constituted application. ¶¶21-¶22

Subhagiya Vs Ramprasad — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:CGHC:6728

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.02.06 14:07:26 +0530

¶5

MCC No. 128 of 2025

¶6

1. Subhagiya D/o Devsharan Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Jarhi, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur (C.G.),...(Defendants)

¶7

2. Sulendar D/o Devsharan, W/o Kumbhkaran Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Semra, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur (C.G.)

¶8

3. Shyampati D/o Devsharan, W/o Ramdhari Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Kaskela, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.)

¶9

4. Devanti D/o Devsharan Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Singari, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur (C.G.)

¶10

... Applicant(s)

¶11

versus

¶12

1. Ramprasad S/o Devsharan Aged About 57 Years Occupation - Agriculture, R/o Village Singari, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur (C.G.)

¶13

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Surguja, District Surguja (C.G.),...(Defendant)

¶14

	...Non-applicant(s)
For Applicants :	Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate.
For State/ Respondent No. 2 :	Mr. Pramod Shrivastava, Dy. G.A.

¶15

Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board

¶16

06/02/2025

¶17

1) At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants seeks permission

¶18

of this Court to withdraw this application with liberty to file a better

¶19

constituted application.

¶20

2) No objection from other side.

¶21

3) Consequently, instant MCC stands dismissed as withdrawn with the

¶22

aforesaid liberty.

¶23

Sd/(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE

¶24

Ajinkya

Subhagiya v. Ramprasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhagiya v. Ramprasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Jain Vs Indusind Bank Limited

Smt. Resham Bai Vs Smt. Beena Bai and Ors.

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Dr. D. Meshram

Raju Khan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Meghna Kaushik Vs Chhattisgarh Rajya Vipnan Sangh Maryadit, Raipur

State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. Vs Shreeram Verma And Anr.