Dismissed¶24

Pushpa Devi Kamle v. Panchram Yadav

Chhattisgarh HC2 Jul 2025MAC/1656/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

MAC No. 1656 of 2018; High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; non-appearance of appellants' counsel; Pushpa Devi Kamle; Sohan Vaishnav; Panchram Yadav; Ramkali Yadav; Jitendra Yadav; Chola Mandalam M.S. General Insurance Company Limited; United India Insurance Company; Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad; order dated 03/07/2025; NAFR.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, as no one appeared for the appellants. ¶24

Pushpa Devi Kamle Vs Panchram Yadav — Chhattisgarh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Digitally signedby GOPALSINGHDate:2025.07.1917:31:08 +0530

¶3

2025:CGHC:30408

¶4

NAFR

¶5

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶6

MAC No. 1656 of 2018

¶7

1 - Pushpa Devi Kamle W/o Rajkumar Kamle, Aged About 48 Years R/o Adarsh Chowk, Mangla, Police Staiton Civil Lines, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Owner-Tractor No. C.G.-10/da-2024)...........Non-Applicant No. 2, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶8

2 - Sohan Vaishnav, S/o Ramdas Vaishnav, Aged About 52 Years Resident Uslapur, Post Sakri, Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Owner-Trolley No. C.G.-10D-0751)...........Non-Applicant No. 4, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

... Petitioner(s)

¶10

versus

¶11

1 - Panchram Yadav S/o Late Fekuram Yadav, Aged About 45 Years R/o Cheenu, Police Station, Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh.............Claimant, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶12

2 - Ramkali Yadav W/o Panchram Yadav, Aged About 43 Years R/o Cheenu, Police Station, Tahsil And District Mungeli Chhattisgarh..............Claimant, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶13

3 - Jitendra Yadav S/o Santu Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/o Dhuripara, Mangla, Police Station Civil Line, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Driver- Tractor No. C.G.-10/da-2024)...........Non-Applicant, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶14

4 - The Branch Manager, Chola Mandalam M.S. Genearl Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office-Vyapar Vihar Road, Beside Renu Duster Show Room, Police Station Civil Line, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.(Insurer Of Tractor)................Non-

¶15

¶16

Applicant, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶17

5 - The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company, Branch Office- Vyapar Vihar Road, Gurukripa Tower, Second Floor, Amber Automobile, Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Line, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Insurer Of Trolley)...............NonApplicant, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶18

... Respondents

¶19

For Appellants : None For Respondent No.5 : Shri Akash Shrivastava, Advocate on behalf of Shri R.N. Pusty, Advocate

¶20

Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

¶21

Order on Board

¶22

03/07/2025

¶23

No one appears for the appellants.

¶24

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

( Amitendra Kishore Prasad)

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

Gopal Singh

Pushpa Devi Kamle v. Panchram Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushpa Devi Kamle v. Panchram Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Sarita Sharma Vs Jaiky Sharma

Raghuvir Thakur (Minor) Vs Uday Singh Thakur

Branch Manager L. and T. General Insurance Company Limited Vs Chhatri Patel

Sunni Muslim Jamaat Korba Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shiv Bhagwan Rameshwar Lal Charitable Trust Vs Atul Bajaj

Shri Sourabh Sonchhatra Vs Atul Bajaj