Jhabbulal, S/o Dilchand since 17-18 years back. Her father in law has purchased a land in Village- Temar. Since the property purchased by her father in law was purchased from the income of ancestral property, her husband was having half share from his birth on the property of Dilchand and after death of her husband, she inherited the share of her husband and after death of Dilchand, she became the absolute owner of the entire property of Dilchand. The sale deed dated 07.06.1993 is nominal sale deed which has been executed without any consideration. The defendant No. 3 Badra Bai has never married with Chuunnu Lal @ Jhabbu Lal and she has no right over the suit property. In cross-examination, she admitted that in the month of February, 1978, she served a legal notice to her husband Jhabbu Lal @ Chunnu Lal. She denied that her husband has married with Badra Bai in the year 1978. From her detailed cross-examination, the defendants are not able to disturb her status of the first wife of Jhabbu Lal @ Chhunnu Lal. She is the married wife of Jhabbu Lal. Although, she denied the marriage of defendant No. 3 with Chunnu Lal, however, even if it is considered that defendant No. 3 has married with Chunnu Lal, she has no right over the property of Chunnu Lal being the second wife as it has been established in the case that the plaintiff Teeja Bai is the first wife of the Chunnu Lal. Further the evidence come on record that Chunnu Lal has died in the year 1990 and after his death, Dilchand has sold the property of Village- Benderkona to Pandit Ram on 06.06.1991. Since, the property was ancestral property and Dilchand can alienate only half share of suit property but in view of the claim of the plaintiff that she has not claimed over the property of Village- Benderkona, the right and title with respect to the property of