Baldau v. Sadhram
Case brief
What is this about?
FA 260/2015, High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur; Baldau, Balram, Baldeo, Jagdeo, Sukhati @ Ledhi, Kamala, Vimla and Rukhmani (legal heirs of Late Sadhu Ram Kewat, original plaintiffs) v. Sadhram, Sarojdevi Agrawal, Poonam Agrawal and State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Bilaspur. Single-judge order by Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari dated 12/03/2025 dismissing the first appeal for want of prosecution due to repeated non-appearance of the appellants (no counsel: 'For Appellant : None'). Shri Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal appeared for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3; Shri SK Puria, PL for the State. No statutes, precedents or monetary claims involved. Marked NAFR (not approved for reporting).
What did the court decide?
The first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellants had no representation on 17.12.2024 and again on 12.03.2025.