Dismissed
Smt.mayadevi Gupta And Anr. v. Sukhnath And Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCFA/184/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2025:CGHC:57033
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA No. 184 of 2013
1 - Smt.Mayadevi Gupta W/o Krishna Kumar Gupta Aged About 57 Years R/o Khaparganj, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., Chhattisgarh
2 - Krishna Kumar Gupta S/o Nandlal Gupta Aged About 62 Years R/o Khaparganj, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Appellants
versus
1 - Sukhnath S/o Kamta Prasad Aged About 60 Years R/o Near Chilhati Turning, Village- Mopka, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., Chhattisgarh
2 - Ram Kumar S/o Kapil Aged About 50 Years R/o Near Chilhati Turning VillageMopka, P.S. Mopka, Distt. Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of C.G. Thru- Collector, Bilaspur C.G., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
Order Sheet
| 24/11/2025 inder |
None for the appellant. Shri Aman Ansari, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Keshav Dewangan, Advocate for respondent No.2. Shri Aman Tamboli, Panel Lawyer for the State. Even in second round, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of appellant to press the appeal. Thus, this court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge |
|---|
Smt. Mayadevi Gupta
Krishna Kumar Gupta
Sukhnath
Ram Kumar
State Of C.G.
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court